Wine Investment: NFTs and Tokenization

Karolina

31 Aug 2023
Wine Investment: NFTs and Tokenization

For ages, wine has represented not just refinement and cultured taste, but also a profitable investment opportunity. Enthusiasts relish the flavor, fragrance, and texture of a classic bottle, while investors delight in its increasing value over time. Similar to other assets, wine investment is ever-evolving. Technological advancements like NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) and tokenization are transforming this investment landscape, as the digital age meets the time-honored custom of wine investment. This article examines this merger, investigating the intertwining of modern innovations with wine investment traditions.

Fine Wine Investment Environment

Wine Investment Fundamentals

Essentially, investing in wine entails acquiring wines to resell them at an escalated value later on. Some wines, particularly those from esteemed makers or extraordinary vintages, appreciate over the years. Factors influencing a wine's worth comprise its scarcity, age, producer's reputation, and critical evaluations. In contrast with stocks or property investments, the realm of wine investments relies on subjective distinctions: vineyard narratives, winemaking artistry, and fluctuating consumer preferences.

Read this: How does wine investment work?

Hurdles in Conventional Wine Investment

In spite of its appeal, investing in wine comes with obstacles. Provenance - the detailed record of ownership and storage conditions - is crucial. Without perfect history documentation, a bottle's value may drastically reduce since storage conditions significantly influence quality. Authenticating provenance can frequently be an exhausting and uncertain task.

Additionally, tangible costs tied to wine investment like climate-controlled facility storage, breakage or spoilage insurance, and transport can diminish profit margins. Furthermore, wine as an asset type isn't as liquid as stocks or bonds. Investors may have to patiently wait for years or even decades to obtain substantial returns if they depend on a bottle becoming a highly coveted vintage.

The Impact of NFTs on Wine Investment

Utilizing blockchain technology, Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) serve as unique digital assets. Although frequently linked to digital art or collectibles, their use in the wine industry exemplifies their adaptability.

Verification and Tracking of Digital Authentication and Provenance: A significant hurdle in wine investment is verifying the legitimacy and origin of a wine bottle. As a digital certificate of authenticity, NFTs provide a solution to this problem. The blockchain records each digital transaction when a bottle is transferred, constructing a secure chain of ownership and storage conditions.

Global and Immediate Transferability: In contrast to conventional wine investments that require physical bottles to be handled, insured, and stored, NFTs enable the swift transfer of ownership rights. This feature allows for international transactions without the need for shipping or the possibility of damage risks, simplifying the buying and selling process for investors.

Broadening Access to Exclusive Wine Investments: Before NFTs, only wealthy elites had access to investing in rare and vintage wines. By digitally representing wines through NFTs, fractional ownership becomes possible. This development permits numerous investors to own a portion of a bottle's value, expanding investment opportunities for more individuals in the market.

Wine Tokenization

Tokenization is the process of dividing an asset into smaller, exchangeable units or tokens. In the context of the wine industry, this entails transforming either physical bottles or entire vineyards' worth into digital tokens, which can then be purchased, sold, or traded like company stocks.

Understanding Tokenization

Asset Division: Similar to breaking down a company into shares, wine bottles, collections, or vineyards can be separated into numerous tokens that each signify a portion of the asset's value.

Comparing and Contrasting NFTs with Tokenization: While both NFTs and tokenization entail digitally representing assets on a blockchain, a crucial distinction exists. NFTs signify unique, individual assets, rendering each one distinct. However, tokenization creates multiple identical tokens that denote partial ownership of a single asset.

Advantages of Wine Tokenization

  • Increased Liquidity in the Wine Market: Conventional wine investment often faces challenges due to the time it takes to yield returns. To counter this problem, tokenization allows investors to sell their tokens as desired, injecting liquidity into the market.
  • Opportunities for Partial Ownership and Crowd-Investment: Tokenization goes further than NFTs in making wine investment accessible. By acquiring tokens, individuals can invest in high-value wines or vineyards without purchasing the entire asset, enabling crowd-investment. 
  • Efficient and Clear Valuation Processes: When each token represents a specific asset value and with all transactions transparently recorded on the blockchain, valuations become more streamlined and unambiguous. This clarity helps eliminate the uncertainty typically associated with traditional wine valuations.

Exploring Possible Risks and Criticisms

Although merging the wine industry and NFTs with tokenization seems promising, it is also accompanied by critics and obstacles.

Digital Asset Volatility and Speculation

Market Fluctuations: Similar to the well-known volatility of cryptocurrencies, NFTs and tokenized assets may undergo rapid shifts in value.

Excessive Speculation: The possibility of high returns can encourage speculative bubbles. Like any investment, the risk of a bubble bursting is present, potentially resulting in losses for late investors.

Environmental Impact

Power Usage: Blockchain technology, which supports NFTs and tokenization, often faces critique for its considerable energy consumption, particularly in networks like Ethereum.

Weighing Advantages against Issues: While digital assets provide unparalleled benefits, discussions on how to render the technology more eco-friendly continue.

Future Prospects - Merging Traditional Practices and Innovative Technologies

The union of classic wine investment with advanced technology symbolizes an intriguing convergence between the past and present.

Expanding Beyond Wine: The achievements in wine's tokenization and NFT representation indicate a possible trend for other high-end items like rare artwork or vintage cars.

Democratized Market Accessibility: As NFTs and tokenization contribute to democratization, it is probable that a broader global audience will engage in wine investment.

Incorporating Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR): Emerging technologies might facilitate virtual tours of vineyards or wine cellars for investors, enriching their online wine investment experience.

Conclusion

An intriguing intersection between tradition and modernity now exists in the realm of wine investment. As digital innovations intertwine with the storied customs surrounding wine appreciation, investors face both unprecedented opportunities as well as new challenges. While NFTs and tokenization transform our perception of asset ownership, they also reaffirm the fundamental nature of wine investment: the stories, artistry, and shared experiences encapsulated by each bottle. As we raise a glass to the future of wine investment, one constant endures - the pursuit is as exhilarating as the destination itself.

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Kajetan Olas

22 Nov 2024
Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Authors of the contents are not affiliated to the reviewed project in any way and none of the information presented should be taken as financial advice.

In this article we analyze tokenomics of Aethir - a project providing on-demand cloud compute resources for the AI, Gaming, and virtualized compute sectors.
Aethir aims to aggregate enterprise-grade GPUs from multiple providers into a DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network). Its competitive edge comes from utlizing the GPUs for very specific use-cases, such as low-latency rendering for online games.
Due to decentralized nature of its infrastructure Aethir can meet the demands of online-gaming in any region. This is especially important for some gamer-abundant regions in Asia with underdeveloped cloud infrastructure that causes high latency ("lags").
We will analyze Aethir's tokenomics, give our opinion on what was done well, and provide specific recommendations on how to improve it.

Evaluation Summary

Aethir Tokenomics Structure

The total supply of ATH tokens is capped at 42 billion ATH. This fixed cap provides a predictable supply environment, and the complete emissions schedule is listed here. As of November 2024 there are approximately 5.2 Billion ATH in circulation. In a year from now (November 2025), the circulating supply will almost triple, and will amount to approximately 15 Billion ATH. By November 2028, today's circulating supply will be diluted by around 86%.

From an investor standpoint the rational decision would be to stake their tokens and hope for rewards that will balance the inflation. Currently the estimated APR for 3-year staking is 195% and for 4-year staking APR is 261%. The rewards are paid out weekly. Furthermore, stakers can expect to get additional rewards from partnered AI projects.

Staking Incentives

Rewards are calculated based on the staking duration and staked amount. These factors are equally important and they linearly influence weekly rewards. This means that someone who stakes 100 ATH for 2 weeks will have the same weekly rewards as someone who stakes 200 ATH for 1 week. This mechanism greatly emphasizes long-term holding. That's because holding a token makes sense only if you go for long-term staking. E.g. a whale staking $200k with 1 week lockup. will have the same weekly rewards as person staking $1k with 4 year lockup. Furthermore the ATH staking rewards are fixed and divided among stakers. Therefore Increase of user base is likely to come with decrease in rewards.
We believe the main weak-point of Aethirs staking is the lack of equivalency between rewards paid out to the users and value generated for the protocol as a result of staking.

Token Distribution

The token distribution of $ATH is well designed and comes with long vesting time-frames. 18-month cliff and 36-moths subsequent linear vesting is applied to team's allocation. This is higher than industry standard and is a sign of long-term commitment.

  • Checkers and Compute Providers: 50%
  • Ecosystem: 15%
  • Team: 12.5%
  • Investors: 11.5%
  • Airdrop: 6%
  • Advisors: 5%

Aethir's airdrop is divided into 3 phases to ensure that only loyal users get rewarded. This mechanism is very-well thought and we rate it highly. It fosters high community engagement within the first months of the project and sets the ground for potentially giving more-control to the DAO.

Governance and Community-Led Development

Aethir’s governance model promotes community-led decision-making in a very practical way. Instead of rushing with creation of a DAO for PR and marketing purposes Aethir is trying to make it the right way. They support projects building on their infrastructure and regularly share updates with their community in the most professional manner.

We believe Aethir would benefit from implementing reputation boosted voting. An example of such system is described here. The core assumption is to abandon the simplistic: 1 token = 1 vote and go towards: Votes = tokens * reputation_based_multiplication_factor.

In the attached example, reputation_based_multiplication_factor rises exponentially with the number of standard deviations above norm, with regard to user's rating. For compute compute providers at Aethir, user's rating could be replaced by provider's uptime.

Perspectives for the future

While it's important to analyze aspects such as supply-side tokenomics, or governance, we must keep in mind that 95% of project's success depends on demand-side. In this regard the outlook for Aethir may be very bright. The project declares $36M annual reccuring revenue. Revenue like this is very rare in the web3 space. Many projects are not able to generate any revenue after succesfull ICO event, due to lack fo product-market-fit.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

Quadratic Voting in Web3

Kajetan Olas

04 Dec 2024
Quadratic Voting in Web3

Decentralized systems are reshaping how we interact, conduct transactions, and govern online communities. As Web3 continues to advance, the necessity for effective and fair voting mechanisms becomes apparent. Traditional voting systems, such as the one-token-one-vote model, often fall short in capturing the intensity of individual preferences, which can result in centralization. Quadratic Voting (QV) addresses this challenge by enabling individuals to express not only their choices but also the strength of their preferences.

In QV, voters are allocated a budget of credits that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The cost of casting multiple votes on a single issue increases quadratically, meaning that each additional vote costs more than the last. This system allows for a more precise expression of preferences, as individuals can invest more heavily in issues they care deeply about while conserving credits on matters of lesser importance.

Understanding Quadratic Voting

Quadratic Voting (QV) is a voting system designed to capture not only the choices of individuals but also the strength of their preferences. In most DAO voting mechanisms, each person typically has one vote per token, which limits the ability to express how strongly they feel about a particular matter. Furthermore, QV limits the power of whales and founding team who typically have large token allocations. These problems are adressed by making the cost of each additional vote increase quadratically.

In QV, each voter is given a budget of credits or tokens that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The key principle is that the cost to cast n votes on a single issue is proportional to the square of n. This quadratic cost function ensures that while voters can express stronger preferences, doing so requires a disproportionately higher expenditure of their voting credits. This mechanism discourages voters from concentrating all their influence on a single issue unless they feel very strongly about it. In the context of DAOs, it means that large holders will have a hard-time pushing through with a proposal if they'll try to do it on their own.

Practical Example

Consider a voter who has been allocated 25 voting credits to spend on several proposals. The voter has varying degrees of interest in three proposals: Proposal A, Proposal B, and Proposal C.

  • Proposal A: High interest.
  • Proposal B: Moderate interest.
  • Proposal C: Low interest.

The voter might allocate their credits as follows:

Proposal A:

  • Votes cast: 3
  • Cost: 9 delegated tokens

Proposal B:

  • Votes cast: 2
  • Cost: 4 delegated tokens

Proposal C:

  • Votes cast: 1
  • Cost: 1 delegated token

Total delegated tokens: 14
Remaining tokens: 11

With the remaining tokens, the voter can choose to allocate additional votes to the proposals based on their preferences or save for future proposals. If they feel particularly strong about Proposal A, they might decide to cast one more vote:

Additional vote on Proposal A:

  • New total votes: 4
  • New cost: 16 delegated tokens
  • Additional cost: 16−9 = 7 delegated tokens

Updated total delegated tokens: 14+7 = 21

Updated remaining tokens: 25−21 = 425 - 21 = 4

This additional vote on Proposal A costs 7 credits, significantly more than the previous vote, illustrating how the quadratic cost discourages excessive influence on a single issue without strong conviction.

Benefits of Implementing Quadratic Voting

Key Characteristics of the Quadratic Cost Function

  • Marginal Cost Increases Linearly: The marginal cost of each additional vote increases linearly. The cost difference between casting n and n−1 votes is 2n−1.
  • Total Cost Increases Quadratically: The total cost to cast multiple votes rises steeply, discouraging voters from concentrating too many votes on a single issue without significant reason.
  • Promotes Egalitarian Voting: Small voters are encouraged to participate, because relatively they have a much higher impact.

Advantages Over Traditional Voting Systems

Quadratic Voting offers several benefits compared to traditional one-person-one-vote systems:

  • Captures Preference Intensity: By allowing voters to express how strongly they feel about an issue, QV leads to outcomes that better reflect the collective welfare.
  • Reduces Majority Domination: The quadratic cost makes it costly for majority groups to overpower minority interests on every issue.
  • Encourages Honest Voting: Voters are incentivized to allocate votes in proportion to their true preferences, reducing manipulation.

By understanding the foundation of Quadratic Voting, stakeholders in Web3 communities can appreciate how this system supports more representative governance.

Conclusion

Quadratic voting is a novel voting system that may be used within DAOs to foster decentralization. The key idea is to make the cost of voting on a certain issue increase quadratically. The leading player that makes use of this mechanism is Optimism. If you're pondering about the design of your DAO, we highly recommend taking a look at their research on quadratic funding.

If you're looking to create a robust governance model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure that your DAO will stand out as a beacon of innovation and resilience in the long term.