Usability and utility is the hottest trend in NFT

Maciej Zieliński

23 Aug 2022
Usability and utility is the hottest trend in NFT

NFT is gaining popularity not only in the new technology sector but also in the real business world. Currently, NFT can be divided into two groups: 

  • Collectible items - these are tokens intended to be collected and owned - such as artwork, celebrity merchandise, entertainment content, Twitter names/domains, and memorabilia
  • Consumables are things or rights that can be realistically used, e.g., the right to download limited edition music, the right to share products and content, etc. 

What this means in practice is that an NFT with a utility function realizes its value based on services provided, consumption, and cooperation between companies. How does NFT create value? When do products become helpful, and how can they be used - we write about this below!

How does NFT create value?

We should remember that quantitative and qualitative factors influence NFT value. In practice: 

  • utility, 
  • rarity,
  • liquidity is the main factor of value creation. 

The market is shaping to treat utility as the primary value, which determines the approximate range of benefits obtained from owning NFTs. In addition to utility, rarity also increases their value. Typically, NFTs are issued in limited quantities - sometimes unique - gaining additional cache among collectors, so even a small increase in demand can lead to a rise in their price. It's important to remember that NFT transactions rely on liquidity, just like existing cryptocurrencies. This is important because liquidity makes people willing to take the risk of holding NFTs at high prices, thus increasing their value.

Emotion, and value and utility in NFTs 

The primary factor affecting the value of NFTs in terms of utility is the emotional charge that accompanies a product or service. Emotions show people's broad interests and tastes. It should be noted that an emotional approach in NFT arises when it is backed by, for example, social status, finances, property rights, great experiences, etc. When the above factors combine, the emotional appeal of an item leads to increased demand.

Utility of NFT for business

The usefulness of NFTs lies in their use of blockchain technology. With it, all rights and ownership of NFTs are extraordinarily secure and guaranteed. Smart contracts, blockchain, and NFT are gaining popularity in everyday life. It's easy to imagine a world where all contracts, movables, and real estate are reflected in NFT—selling a house using NFT? Nothing more straightforward - once the amount is booked, the smart contract will automatically transfer the rights to the new buyer, skipping all the red tape and selling a car. NFT will transfer, register and transfer ownership of the vehicle to the buyer once the funds are booked. It's a completely secure, fast, and transparent solution. No one will break blockchain technology, forge the title deed, sales contract, etc. Instead of looking for documents to prove ownership, this NFT will give you an actual record of the entire ownership history of the item.

The utility of NFT, and documents 

Nowadays, most people know that paper transactions are inefficient, require more staff, and are easy to lose (fire, flood, lost documents). Nevertheless, the paper has an advantage over documents in the cloud - confirming the authenticity of classic documentation is easier. In addition, documents stored online can be hacked, copied, or altered, which happens very often and generates high costs for companies. NFT transactions can solve both of these problems. They provide another form of security to digital commerce while making the entire process more efficient. Everyone involved in the transaction can follow the path from the creation of the NFT to the final version in real-time and know who else is involved. Identity theft can be a thing of the past. The assets represented by the NFT are tracked and verified for existence, increasing the confidence of all parties that transactions are carefully planned.

Advantages of utility in NFTs 

NFTs themselves carry some advantages. The following are benefits that can be directly linked to utility:

utility
  • They can significantly reduce transaction processing costs for buyers and sellers of goods or services.
  • NFTs are easy to create, and a person can enter a few NFTs per hour - something they can't do with physical documents or even a large number of digital documents.
  • Enhanced security - no possibility of forged documents thanks to blockchain technology. 
  • No bureaucracy - the process is automatic using smart contracts. 
  • Interoperability - NFT helps keep all rights, settlements, and ownership between the consumer and the company in one place. 

Utility in NFT improves the brand-consumer relationship

Whether the NFT in question is musical, artistic, or collectible, it can be used to improve the relationship between artists and fans. Artists, in many cases, give preference to their art to fans who are in their clubs. NFT makes it easier to identify fans and even presents a history of their brand loyalty. Usability in NFT also allows communication between seller and buyer, which can be used to promote or pay for the artwork. 

Problems with utility in NFT 

We wrote earlier about the emotional charge associated with NFT. Like any solution, usability in NFT can carry some drawbacks. The first of these is undoubtedly the availability of the product. This is because blockchain technology and NFT (although constantly developing) are still known in a closed environment. The process, from creating a decentralized wallet to purchasing the final NFT, is complex. Having to double or triple fees along the way can be very inconvenient, especially for the general public. Additionally, many countries have legislative problems regarding NFTs. There are different criteria for interpreting NFTs as virtual assets, and many countries are having trouble regulating them. Although it appears to be a complicated sector, it can significantly facilitate many areas of the economy in practice.  

Examples of utility in NFT 

Some companies are implementing NFT usability into their businesses, moving with the times. Below are examples of sectors that are already using it: 

  • Art - Art Blocks is a leader in next-generation art. The listed platform supports the projects of the most innovative digital artists, combining creative coding with blockchain technology to establish a new paradigm of artistic creation and ownership. Through NFT's utility, collectors can participate in the realization of an artist's vision, resulting in unique algorithmic artworks. This symbiotic relationship and shared experience are the foundation of a vibrant community. 
  • Socks - is a sales project affiliated with Uniswap, where the purchase and sale of socks are made real by NFT. SOCKS are ERC-20 tokens and can be used like any other ERC-20 token on Ethereum. Uniswap created an initial liquidity pool of 500 SOCKS and 35 ETH to facilitate user trading. It's an exciting and humorous concept combining NFT with a real product. 
  • Jewelry - Tiffany & Co, a luxury jewelry company, intends to sell NFTs that give CryptoPunk holders the right to turn their NFTs into custom pendants containing gems and diamonds. It's a concept that works in reverse to SOCKS because here, you are really buying a charm that you can then wear in the CryptoPunk metaverse. 
  • GMI hoodie - Each hoodie contains an IYK chip that can be scanned upon receipt to obtain a combined NFT token and $1 GMI token. You don't need to download the application to make a claim. If you sell your hoodie, the new owner can pull the NFT from your wallet into theirs. This exciting project combines broad movable property rights - both classic and digital - in one place. 

Summary 

The utility of NFT is one of the most important features of this kind of technology. It allows the transfer of property rights, improves the relationship between consumers and creators, and minimizes bureaucracy. Some companies are already taking advantage of NFT's usability - others are just analyzing the possibility of implementing this system into their corporation. It is undoubtedly one of the most exciting topics in 2022, so it is worth learning about its advantages and disadvantages!

Tagi

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Kajetan Olas

22 Nov 2024
Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Authors of the contents are not affiliated to the reviewed project in any way and none of the information presented should be taken as financial advice.

In this article we analyze tokenomics of Aethir - a project providing on-demand cloud compute resources for the AI, Gaming, and virtualized compute sectors.
Aethir aims to aggregate enterprise-grade GPUs from multiple providers into a DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network). Its competitive edge comes from utlizing the GPUs for very specific use-cases, such as low-latency rendering for online games.
Due to decentralized nature of its infrastructure Aethir can meet the demands of online-gaming in any region. This is especially important for some gamer-abundant regions in Asia with underdeveloped cloud infrastructure that causes high latency ("lags").
We will analyze Aethir's tokenomics, give our opinion on what was done well, and provide specific recommendations on how to improve it.

Evaluation Summary

Aethir Tokenomics Structure

The total supply of ATH tokens is capped at 42 billion ATH. This fixed cap provides a predictable supply environment, and the complete emissions schedule is listed here. As of November 2024 there are approximately 5.2 Billion ATH in circulation. In a year from now (November 2025), the circulating supply will almost triple, and will amount to approximately 15 Billion ATH. By November 2028, today's circulating supply will be diluted by around 86%.

From an investor standpoint the rational decision would be to stake their tokens and hope for rewards that will balance the inflation. Currently the estimated APR for 3-year staking is 195% and for 4-year staking APR is 261%. The rewards are paid out weekly. Furthermore, stakers can expect to get additional rewards from partnered AI projects.

Staking Incentives

Rewards are calculated based on the staking duration and staked amount. These factors are equally important and they linearly influence weekly rewards. This means that someone who stakes 100 ATH for 2 weeks will have the same weekly rewards as someone who stakes 200 ATH for 1 week. This mechanism greatly emphasizes long-term holding. That's because holding a token makes sense only if you go for long-term staking. E.g. a whale staking $200k with 1 week lockup. will have the same weekly rewards as person staking $1k with 4 year lockup. Furthermore the ATH staking rewards are fixed and divided among stakers. Therefore Increase of user base is likely to come with decrease in rewards.
We believe the main weak-point of Aethirs staking is the lack of equivalency between rewards paid out to the users and value generated for the protocol as a result of staking.

Token Distribution

The token distribution of $ATH is well designed and comes with long vesting time-frames. 18-month cliff and 36-moths subsequent linear vesting is applied to team's allocation. This is higher than industry standard and is a sign of long-term commitment.

  • Checkers and Compute Providers: 50%
  • Ecosystem: 15%
  • Team: 12.5%
  • Investors: 11.5%
  • Airdrop: 6%
  • Advisors: 5%

Aethir's airdrop is divided into 3 phases to ensure that only loyal users get rewarded. This mechanism is very-well thought and we rate it highly. It fosters high community engagement within the first months of the project and sets the ground for potentially giving more-control to the DAO.

Governance and Community-Led Development

Aethir’s governance model promotes community-led decision-making in a very practical way. Instead of rushing with creation of a DAO for PR and marketing purposes Aethir is trying to make it the right way. They support projects building on their infrastructure and regularly share updates with their community in the most professional manner.

We believe Aethir would benefit from implementing reputation boosted voting. An example of such system is described here. The core assumption is to abandon the simplistic: 1 token = 1 vote and go towards: Votes = tokens * reputation_based_multiplication_factor.

In the attached example, reputation_based_multiplication_factor rises exponentially with the number of standard deviations above norm, with regard to user's rating. For compute compute providers at Aethir, user's rating could be replaced by provider's uptime.

Perspectives for the future

While it's important to analyze aspects such as supply-side tokenomics, or governance, we must keep in mind that 95% of project's success depends on demand-side. In this regard the outlook for Aethir may be very bright. The project declares $36M annual reccuring revenue. Revenue like this is very rare in the web3 space. Many projects are not able to generate any revenue after succesfull ICO event, due to lack fo product-market-fit.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

Quadratic Voting in Web3

Kajetan Olas

04 Dec 2024
Quadratic Voting in Web3

Decentralized systems are reshaping how we interact, conduct transactions, and govern online communities. As Web3 continues to advance, the necessity for effective and fair voting mechanisms becomes apparent. Traditional voting systems, such as the one-token-one-vote model, often fall short in capturing the intensity of individual preferences, which can result in centralization. Quadratic Voting (QV) addresses this challenge by enabling individuals to express not only their choices but also the strength of their preferences.

In QV, voters are allocated a budget of credits that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The cost of casting multiple votes on a single issue increases quadratically, meaning that each additional vote costs more than the last. This system allows for a more precise expression of preferences, as individuals can invest more heavily in issues they care deeply about while conserving credits on matters of lesser importance.

Understanding Quadratic Voting

Quadratic Voting (QV) is a voting system designed to capture not only the choices of individuals but also the strength of their preferences. In most DAO voting mechanisms, each person typically has one vote per token, which limits the ability to express how strongly they feel about a particular matter. Furthermore, QV limits the power of whales and founding team who typically have large token allocations. These problems are adressed by making the cost of each additional vote increase quadratically.

In QV, each voter is given a budget of credits or tokens that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The key principle is that the cost to cast n votes on a single issue is proportional to the square of n. This quadratic cost function ensures that while voters can express stronger preferences, doing so requires a disproportionately higher expenditure of their voting credits. This mechanism discourages voters from concentrating all their influence on a single issue unless they feel very strongly about it. In the context of DAOs, it means that large holders will have a hard-time pushing through with a proposal if they'll try to do it on their own.

Practical Example

Consider a voter who has been allocated 25 voting credits to spend on several proposals. The voter has varying degrees of interest in three proposals: Proposal A, Proposal B, and Proposal C.

  • Proposal A: High interest.
  • Proposal B: Moderate interest.
  • Proposal C: Low interest.

The voter might allocate their credits as follows:

Proposal A:

  • Votes cast: 3
  • Cost: 9 delegated tokens

Proposal B:

  • Votes cast: 2
  • Cost: 4 delegated tokens

Proposal C:

  • Votes cast: 1
  • Cost: 1 delegated token

Total delegated tokens: 14
Remaining tokens: 11

With the remaining tokens, the voter can choose to allocate additional votes to the proposals based on their preferences or save for future proposals. If they feel particularly strong about Proposal A, they might decide to cast one more vote:

Additional vote on Proposal A:

  • New total votes: 4
  • New cost: 16 delegated tokens
  • Additional cost: 16−9 = 7 delegated tokens

Updated total delegated tokens: 14+7 = 21

Updated remaining tokens: 25−21 = 425 - 21 = 4

This additional vote on Proposal A costs 7 credits, significantly more than the previous vote, illustrating how the quadratic cost discourages excessive influence on a single issue without strong conviction.

Benefits of Implementing Quadratic Voting

Key Characteristics of the Quadratic Cost Function

  • Marginal Cost Increases Linearly: The marginal cost of each additional vote increases linearly. The cost difference between casting n and n−1 votes is 2n−1.
  • Total Cost Increases Quadratically: The total cost to cast multiple votes rises steeply, discouraging voters from concentrating too many votes on a single issue without significant reason.
  • Promotes Egalitarian Voting: Small voters are encouraged to participate, because relatively they have a much higher impact.

Advantages Over Traditional Voting Systems

Quadratic Voting offers several benefits compared to traditional one-person-one-vote systems:

  • Captures Preference Intensity: By allowing voters to express how strongly they feel about an issue, QV leads to outcomes that better reflect the collective welfare.
  • Reduces Majority Domination: The quadratic cost makes it costly for majority groups to overpower minority interests on every issue.
  • Encourages Honest Voting: Voters are incentivized to allocate votes in proportion to their true preferences, reducing manipulation.

By understanding the foundation of Quadratic Voting, stakeholders in Web3 communities can appreciate how this system supports more representative governance.

Conclusion

Quadratic voting is a novel voting system that may be used within DAOs to foster decentralization. The key idea is to make the cost of voting on a certain issue increase quadratically. The leading player that makes use of this mechanism is Optimism. If you're pondering about the design of your DAO, we highly recommend taking a look at their research on quadratic funding.

If you're looking to create a robust governance model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure that your DAO will stand out as a beacon of innovation and resilience in the long term.