Tokenizing Whiskey: the Next Big Investment Trend?

Karolina

14 Sep 2023
Tokenizing Whiskey: the Next Big Investment Trend?

In recent times, we have observed a striking convergence of traditional assets and advanced technology. The idea of tokenization, where physical assets such as real estate or artwork are transformed into digital tokens, exemplifies this intersection. As industries explore inventive methods to integrate the physical and digital worlds, the whiskey market does not lag. The notion of "tokenizing whiskey" is more than just innovative; it could potentially revolutionize the investment arena. However, what does it genuinely entail to tokenize an asset like whiskey, one that has endured the test of time? 

Understanding Tokenization

Fundamentals of Tokenization

Tokenization involves converting the ownership rights of a tangible asset into a digital token, often using blockchain technology. This allows assets to be divided, purchased, sold, or exchanged on digital platforms without needing to transfer the physical asset itself. Consider it as possessing a digital proxy of your stake in an asset. For example, you might own a token representing a portion of an artwork's worth rather than owning the entire piece.

The Functioning of Tokenization

To tokenize an asset, it is usually documented on a blockchain - a decentralized and unalterable ledger. This guarantees secure, transparent, and incorruptible ownership and transactions associated with the token. Once recorded on the blockchain, these tokens can be traded on different platforms, enabling increased liquidity and accessibility. In terms of whiskey, this could involve tokenizing either a scarce bottle or an entire barrel, granting multiple people the opportunity to own a "share" of it.

The Value of Whiskey as an Asset

More than a simple drink, whiskey signifies craftsmanship, history, and terroir, with its worth reaching beyond mere flavor.

The Historical Importance and Worth of Whiskey

With its origins deeply rooted in various cultures ranging from the Scottish Highlands to the American South, whiskey serves as a symbol of human ingenuity and tradition. Collectors and enthusiasts consider rare vintages and one-of-a-kind blends priceless for the stories they hold from bygone eras.

Whiskey Investment's Expanding Market

Over recent decades, whiskey has risen as a profitable investment opportunity. Limited editions and rare vintages have consistently seen their value grow, sometimes surpassing traditional investment methods. Record-breaking sales reported by auction houses and specialized trading platforms highlight the financial potential of this golden spirit.

Advantages of Whiskey Tokenization

Whiskey tokenization presents a novel approach to owning, trading, and appreciating this ancient spirit in today's digital age.

Fractional Ownership and Accessibility

Tokenization opens up the world of whiskey investment to everyone. Owning an entire bottle or cask is no longer necessary to have a stake in it. Digital tokens representing fractional ownership allow a wider audience to invest and share in the potential gains of valuable whiskeys.

Enhanced Liquidity

Selling a rare whiskey bottle or cask can be tedious and may not always garner its real value due to market constraints. Tokenization allows these assets to be traded on digital platforms, providing heightened liquidity for owners to take advantage of their investments more quickly.

Provenance and Transparency

The foundation of tokenization, blockchain technology, guarantees the authenticity and origin of tokenized whiskey. This significantly reduces fraud chances, ensures accurate product valuation, and maintains a transparent record for every individual involved in the token's lifespan.

Potential Challenges and Criticisms

Tokenization has the potential to expand investment opportunities and boost market liquidity, but it relies heavily on technological infrastructure. Not everyone possesses technical skills, and incorporating blockchain platforms into conventional investment tactics may discourage some people. Moreover, as with any digital system, inherent risks such as hacking or technology malfunctions exist.

Whiskey, like wine, boasts a rich heritage and a devoted community of purists. There is a worry that the tokenization of whiskey might weaken its historical and cultural importance. Many traditionalists believe that whiskey should be enjoyed, collected, and shared in tangible form rather than being traded as digital tokens. Additionally, there is concern that tokenization might turn whiskey into a mere commodity, leading its artistry and heritage to be overshadowed by investment profits.

Tokenized Whiskey's Future

Despite its obstacles, whiskey tokenization offers a world full of potential. As digitization becomes increasingly prominent, even traditional sectors are likely to adapt and transform.

  • Joint Ventures. Tech companies and esteemed whiskey brands may collaborate, merging tradition with innovation. These alliances could maintain the essence of whiskey while catering to the evolving investment landscape.
  • All-encompassing Investment Portfolios. Tokenizing whiskey can enable individuals who lack expertise to invest in and reap the rewards of rare and vintage bottles' appreciation. This will result in a more inclusive whiskey market, attracting a broader array of investors.
  • Improved Verification and Authenticity. As tokenization becomes more widespread among whiskeys, advancements in technology will follow suit. Blockchain can be employed to confirm the authenticity of each bottle or cask, offering traceable histories that verify origin and ownership.
  • Dedicated Marketplaces. Specialized platforms and exchanges for trading tokenized whiskeys may emerge in the future, featuring expert evaluations, historical information, and investment patterns.

In summary, although whiskey tokenization is still in its early stages, it possesses the potential to transform both investment and the esteemed world of whiskey. The true extent of its influence remains to be seen, but the path ahead looks promising.

Conclusion

Tokenizing Whiskey: the Next Big Investment Trend? As we stand on the cusp of a transformative period in the realm of whiskey – a world deeply rooted in tradition and heritage – tokenization emerges as a game changer. By combining the intricate characteristics of this esteemed spirit with state-of-the-art blockchain technology, fresh investment opportunities and a widened appreciation for whiskey's worth come into play. Although certain obstacles might emerge, the potential gains are immense. Whiskey tokenization exemplifies the ever-changing nature of both investment and tradition, as the boundaries between the physical and digital worlds become indistinguishable. The future calls out to us, presenting a reality where savoring a sip of whiskey could simultaneously represent a taste of the digital age.

Read also: Wine Investment: NFTs and Tokenization

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Kajetan Olas

22 Nov 2024
Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Authors of the contents are not affiliated to the reviewed project in any way and none of the information presented should be taken as financial advice.

In this article we analyze tokenomics of Aethir - a project providing on-demand cloud compute resources for the AI, Gaming, and virtualized compute sectors.
Aethir aims to aggregate enterprise-grade GPUs from multiple providers into a DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network). Its competitive edge comes from utlizing the GPUs for very specific use-cases, such as low-latency rendering for online games.
Due to decentralized nature of its infrastructure Aethir can meet the demands of online-gaming in any region. This is especially important for some gamer-abundant regions in Asia with underdeveloped cloud infrastructure that causes high latency ("lags").
We will analyze Aethir's tokenomics, give our opinion on what was done well, and provide specific recommendations on how to improve it.

Evaluation Summary

Aethir Tokenomics Structure

The total supply of ATH tokens is capped at 42 billion ATH. This fixed cap provides a predictable supply environment, and the complete emissions schedule is listed here. As of November 2024 there are approximately 5.2 Billion ATH in circulation. In a year from now (November 2025), the circulating supply will almost triple, and will amount to approximately 15 Billion ATH. By November 2028, today's circulating supply will be diluted by around 86%.

From an investor standpoint the rational decision would be to stake their tokens and hope for rewards that will balance the inflation. Currently the estimated APR for 3-year staking is 195% and for 4-year staking APR is 261%. The rewards are paid out weekly. Furthermore, stakers can expect to get additional rewards from partnered AI projects.

Staking Incentives

Rewards are calculated based on the staking duration and staked amount. These factors are equally important and they linearly influence weekly rewards. This means that someone who stakes 100 ATH for 2 weeks will have the same weekly rewards as someone who stakes 200 ATH for 1 week. This mechanism greatly emphasizes long-term holding. That's because holding a token makes sense only if you go for long-term staking. E.g. a whale staking $200k with 1 week lockup. will have the same weekly rewards as person staking $1k with 4 year lockup. Furthermore the ATH staking rewards are fixed and divided among stakers. Therefore Increase of user base is likely to come with decrease in rewards.
We believe the main weak-point of Aethirs staking is the lack of equivalency between rewards paid out to the users and value generated for the protocol as a result of staking.

Token Distribution

The token distribution of $ATH is well designed and comes with long vesting time-frames. 18-month cliff and 36-moths subsequent linear vesting is applied to team's allocation. This is higher than industry standard and is a sign of long-term commitment.

  • Checkers and Compute Providers: 50%
  • Ecosystem: 15%
  • Team: 12.5%
  • Investors: 11.5%
  • Airdrop: 6%
  • Advisors: 5%

Aethir's airdrop is divided into 3 phases to ensure that only loyal users get rewarded. This mechanism is very-well thought and we rate it highly. It fosters high community engagement within the first months of the project and sets the ground for potentially giving more-control to the DAO.

Governance and Community-Led Development

Aethir’s governance model promotes community-led decision-making in a very practical way. Instead of rushing with creation of a DAO for PR and marketing purposes Aethir is trying to make it the right way. They support projects building on their infrastructure and regularly share updates with their community in the most professional manner.

We believe Aethir would benefit from implementing reputation boosted voting. An example of such system is described here. The core assumption is to abandon the simplistic: 1 token = 1 vote and go towards: Votes = tokens * reputation_based_multiplication_factor.

In the attached example, reputation_based_multiplication_factor rises exponentially with the number of standard deviations above norm, with regard to user's rating. For compute compute providers at Aethir, user's rating could be replaced by provider's uptime.

Perspectives for the future

While it's important to analyze aspects such as supply-side tokenomics, or governance, we must keep in mind that 95% of project's success depends on demand-side. In this regard the outlook for Aethir may be very bright. The project declares $36M annual reccuring revenue. Revenue like this is very rare in the web3 space. Many projects are not able to generate any revenue after succesfull ICO event, due to lack fo product-market-fit.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

Quadratic Voting in Web3

Kajetan Olas

04 Dec 2024
Quadratic Voting in Web3

Decentralized systems are reshaping how we interact, conduct transactions, and govern online communities. As Web3 continues to advance, the necessity for effective and fair voting mechanisms becomes apparent. Traditional voting systems, such as the one-token-one-vote model, often fall short in capturing the intensity of individual preferences, which can result in centralization. Quadratic Voting (QV) addresses this challenge by enabling individuals to express not only their choices but also the strength of their preferences.

In QV, voters are allocated a budget of credits that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The cost of casting multiple votes on a single issue increases quadratically, meaning that each additional vote costs more than the last. This system allows for a more precise expression of preferences, as individuals can invest more heavily in issues they care deeply about while conserving credits on matters of lesser importance.

Understanding Quadratic Voting

Quadratic Voting (QV) is a voting system designed to capture not only the choices of individuals but also the strength of their preferences. In most DAO voting mechanisms, each person typically has one vote per token, which limits the ability to express how strongly they feel about a particular matter. Furthermore, QV limits the power of whales and founding team who typically have large token allocations. These problems are adressed by making the cost of each additional vote increase quadratically.

In QV, each voter is given a budget of credits or tokens that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The key principle is that the cost to cast n votes on a single issue is proportional to the square of n. This quadratic cost function ensures that while voters can express stronger preferences, doing so requires a disproportionately higher expenditure of their voting credits. This mechanism discourages voters from concentrating all their influence on a single issue unless they feel very strongly about it. In the context of DAOs, it means that large holders will have a hard-time pushing through with a proposal if they'll try to do it on their own.

Practical Example

Consider a voter who has been allocated 25 voting credits to spend on several proposals. The voter has varying degrees of interest in three proposals: Proposal A, Proposal B, and Proposal C.

  • Proposal A: High interest.
  • Proposal B: Moderate interest.
  • Proposal C: Low interest.

The voter might allocate their credits as follows:

Proposal A:

  • Votes cast: 3
  • Cost: 9 delegated tokens

Proposal B:

  • Votes cast: 2
  • Cost: 4 delegated tokens

Proposal C:

  • Votes cast: 1
  • Cost: 1 delegated token

Total delegated tokens: 14
Remaining tokens: 11

With the remaining tokens, the voter can choose to allocate additional votes to the proposals based on their preferences or save for future proposals. If they feel particularly strong about Proposal A, they might decide to cast one more vote:

Additional vote on Proposal A:

  • New total votes: 4
  • New cost: 16 delegated tokens
  • Additional cost: 16−9 = 7 delegated tokens

Updated total delegated tokens: 14+7 = 21

Updated remaining tokens: 25−21 = 425 - 21 = 4

This additional vote on Proposal A costs 7 credits, significantly more than the previous vote, illustrating how the quadratic cost discourages excessive influence on a single issue without strong conviction.

Benefits of Implementing Quadratic Voting

Key Characteristics of the Quadratic Cost Function

  • Marginal Cost Increases Linearly: The marginal cost of each additional vote increases linearly. The cost difference between casting n and n−1 votes is 2n−1.
  • Total Cost Increases Quadratically: The total cost to cast multiple votes rises steeply, discouraging voters from concentrating too many votes on a single issue without significant reason.
  • Promotes Egalitarian Voting: Small voters are encouraged to participate, because relatively they have a much higher impact.

Advantages Over Traditional Voting Systems

Quadratic Voting offers several benefits compared to traditional one-person-one-vote systems:

  • Captures Preference Intensity: By allowing voters to express how strongly they feel about an issue, QV leads to outcomes that better reflect the collective welfare.
  • Reduces Majority Domination: The quadratic cost makes it costly for majority groups to overpower minority interests on every issue.
  • Encourages Honest Voting: Voters are incentivized to allocate votes in proportion to their true preferences, reducing manipulation.

By understanding the foundation of Quadratic Voting, stakeholders in Web3 communities can appreciate how this system supports more representative governance.

Conclusion

Quadratic voting is a novel voting system that may be used within DAOs to foster decentralization. The key idea is to make the cost of voting on a certain issue increase quadratically. The leading player that makes use of this mechanism is Optimism. If you're pondering about the design of your DAO, we highly recommend taking a look at their research on quadratic funding.

If you're looking to create a robust governance model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure that your DAO will stand out as a beacon of innovation and resilience in the long term.