Real-world Assets in DeFi

Karolina

12 Sep 2023
Real-world Assets in DeFi

In the ever-changing world of finance, Decentralized Finance, or DeFi, is quickly gaining popularity. With over $44 billion secured within its system, DeFi signifies not just numbers but an evolutionary shift in how cryptocurrency investors manage and grow their assets. This groundbreaking approach has introduced crypto enthusiasts to unique ways of increasing their wealth. However, although DeFi has made a significant impact in the crypto world, its presence remains relatively small within the broader global financial sector. For DeFi to fully realize its potential, it must establish a bridge to the traditional financial system, tapping into the immense opportunities presented by institutional investors and established businesses. Integrating real-world assets, specifically tokenized versions of well-established financial instruments, can pave the way for increased stability in DeFi.

DeFi's Present State

Accomplishments

The significance of DeFi's rapid ascent in the world of cryptocurrency cannot be downplayed. It serves as a shining example of success, providing crypto holders with chances to generate passive income through creative methods like yield farming. In contrast, borrowers are granted quick access to loans with favorable terms that outshine offerings from even the most experienced traditional financial institutions.

Challenges

However, DeFi isn't without its challenges. Although it represents a substantial presence in the crypto sphere, it faces numerous internal struggles that put its foundation at risk. One particularly problematic issue is over-collateralization, which results from strict requirements imposed on borrowers. To counter price instability, they're often mandated to provide collateral well above the loan's value. For instance, MakerDAO - a stablecoin issuer - demands a shocking $1,500 deposit as collateral for borrowing only $1,000. Should the collateral's worth fall below this amount, harsh liquidation penalties follow. This situation not only presents considerable risks for borrowers but also hinders DeFi's fundamental mission of democratizing financial access. As a result, numerous global businesses remain constrained and unable to utilize DeFi for funding due to the inflexible crypto-only collateral requirement.

Further exacerbating these issues is the problem of liquidity. The initial excitement that pushed DeFi's total value locked (TVL) to a record $236 billion in November 2021 didn't last. The following 'crypto winter' caused a steep decline, dragging TVL down to just $40 billion by mid-2022. This sharp drop significantly impacted most DeFi tokens, diminishing their value by a staggering 80%-90%. Such turmoil severely disrupted DeFi's incentive model, as yields – dependent on deposited funds and paid out in DeFi tokens – suffered a substantial depreciation.

While the DeFi landscape holds great potential, it is also riddled with these daunting obstacles. To fully unlock its possibilities, a strategic integration with traditional finance is necessary.

Uniting Traditional Finance with Decentralized Finance

The Prospects of Tokenizing Physical Assets

As decentralized finance (DeFi) continues to experience growing pains, the answer may lie in tapping into the strengths of traditional finance. Integrating real-world assets, specifically tokenized versions of well-established financial instruments, can pave the way for increased stability in DeFi. Envision tokenized bonds, equities, debt, and physical assets such as gold, real estate, and art incorporated into the DeFi realm. The inclusion of these more stable assets can serve as a protective barrier for user investments and broaden the reach of DeFi protocols.

What does this integration process entail? Tokenization revolves around creating digital replicas of physical assets on a transparent public blockchain. This revolutionary procedure ensures not only transparent transactions but also removes intermediaries from the equation. As a result, transactions become faster and more streamlined, with costs significantly lower than traditional methods.

DeFi Drawing Attention from Institutions

DeFi's potential has captured not only its supporters' interest but also that of major players within traditional finance. The increase in institutional engagement serves as evidence of this trend. Consider BlackRock's recent submission to the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) for approval of a bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF). They're not alone – Fidelity, Invesco, Wisdom Tree, and Valkyrie have also filed ETF applications, demonstrating the growing institutional appetite for DeFi exposure. This interest extends beyond ETFs; Banco Santander's efforts to educate its user base on digital assets and the launch of EDX Exchange by giants like Charles Schwab, Fidelity, and Citadel Securities exemplify the strengthening relationship between DeFi and traditional finance.

Read this article

Integrating Real-world Assets into DeFi

Perks for Conventional Financial Institutions

Traditional financial institutions are undoubtedly drawn to DeFi. Introducing tokenized versions of traditional stocks, commodities, bonds, art, and real estate can revolutionize financial transactions. Present-day markets heavily rely on intermediaries like stockbrokers, who take a cut of the profits with each transaction. However, DeFi has the potential to change that scenario. Enter smart contracts: these self-executing agreements with coded terms automatically complete transactions as soon as pre-defined conditions are met. Faster transactions, decreased administrative expenses, and unparalleled transparency become realistic expectations under DeFi – a transparent, public ledger accessible to everyone fosters a more accountable financial future.

Advantages for DeFi Protocols

Incorporating real-world assets may be the key to resolving DeFi's issues. These assets are generally more stable than the often volatile DeFi tokens, allowing protocols to aspire toward reduced volatility. Decreased liquidations, minimized fluctuations, and overall ecosystem stability become achievable goals. The real game-changer? DeFi becomes accessible to businesses worldwide. Picture a company tokenizing outstanding invoices for quick credit access or assets like art and real estate becoming fractionalized among numerous investors. Such tokenization efforts introduce exclusive DeFi services like staking and yield farming, revolutionizing market accessibility.

Traditional Finance and DeFi Synergy

Mutual Advantages

Traditional finance and DeFi are not in a rivalry for replacement, but instead, they work together to address deficiencies and capitalize on their distinct strengths. Conventionally, the financial markets demonstrate resilience and consistent growth despite global economic uncertainties, while DeFi brings the potential of democratization, transparency, and efficiency which tend to be insufficient in the traditional system.

During the 'crypto winter,' the DeFi market experienced downturns that revealed its susceptibility to volatility. Nonetheless, with extensive expertise, diverse portfolios, and established risk management approaches, traditional markets offer a stabilizing influence against such drastic fluctuations for DeFi.

Integrated Financial Ecosystem

Merging DeFi and TradFi entails developing a financial ecosystem where assets, digital or physical, circulate seamlessly without the existing cumbersome obstacles. This amalgamation may facilitate the creation of hybrid financial products combining the best features of both domains. Envision a situation where traditional real estate investment, backed by tangible property, is effortlessly tokenized, segmented, and traded on a DeFi platform. Alternatively, consider a conventional bank adopting DeFi protocols for immediate loan approvals with fluctuating interest rates determined by real-time market data.

Conclusion

DeFi's progression from its early stages to its present-day prominence signifies its potential for transformation. To genuinely alter the global financial landscape, it must establish a balanced relationship with traditional finance. By incorporating real-world assets and adopting time-tested methods of conventional finance without sacrificing its fundamental principles of decentralization and transparency, DeFi can pave a way towards an innovative, stable, and inclusive future. This partnership doesn't only signify evolution but also indicates a potential revolution that lays groundwork for a financial world with indistinct boundaries, democratized opportunities, and collectively embraced growth.

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Kajetan Olas

22 Nov 2024
Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Authors of the contents are not affiliated to the reviewed project in any way and none of the information presented should be taken as financial advice.

In this article we analyze tokenomics of Aethir - a project providing on-demand cloud compute resources for the AI, Gaming, and virtualized compute sectors.
Aethir aims to aggregate enterprise-grade GPUs from multiple providers into a DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network). Its competitive edge comes from utlizing the GPUs for very specific use-cases, such as low-latency rendering for online games.
Due to decentralized nature of its infrastructure Aethir can meet the demands of online-gaming in any region. This is especially important for some gamer-abundant regions in Asia with underdeveloped cloud infrastructure that causes high latency ("lags").
We will analyze Aethir's tokenomics, give our opinion on what was done well, and provide specific recommendations on how to improve it.

Evaluation Summary

Aethir Tokenomics Structure

The total supply of ATH tokens is capped at 42 billion ATH. This fixed cap provides a predictable supply environment, and the complete emissions schedule is listed here. As of November 2024 there are approximately 5.2 Billion ATH in circulation. In a year from now (November 2025), the circulating supply will almost triple, and will amount to approximately 15 Billion ATH. By November 2028, today's circulating supply will be diluted by around 86%.

From an investor standpoint the rational decision would be to stake their tokens and hope for rewards that will balance the inflation. Currently the estimated APR for 3-year staking is 195% and for 4-year staking APR is 261%. The rewards are paid out weekly. Furthermore, stakers can expect to get additional rewards from partnered AI projects.

Staking Incentives

Rewards are calculated based on the staking duration and staked amount. These factors are equally important and they linearly influence weekly rewards. This means that someone who stakes 100 ATH for 2 weeks will have the same weekly rewards as someone who stakes 200 ATH for 1 week. This mechanism greatly emphasizes long-term holding. That's because holding a token makes sense only if you go for long-term staking. E.g. a whale staking $200k with 1 week lockup. will have the same weekly rewards as person staking $1k with 4 year lockup. Furthermore the ATH staking rewards are fixed and divided among stakers. Therefore Increase of user base is likely to come with decrease in rewards.
We believe the main weak-point of Aethirs staking is the lack of equivalency between rewards paid out to the users and value generated for the protocol as a result of staking.

Token Distribution

The token distribution of $ATH is well designed and comes with long vesting time-frames. 18-month cliff and 36-moths subsequent linear vesting is applied to team's allocation. This is higher than industry standard and is a sign of long-term commitment.

  • Checkers and Compute Providers: 50%
  • Ecosystem: 15%
  • Team: 12.5%
  • Investors: 11.5%
  • Airdrop: 6%
  • Advisors: 5%

Aethir's airdrop is divided into 3 phases to ensure that only loyal users get rewarded. This mechanism is very-well thought and we rate it highly. It fosters high community engagement within the first months of the project and sets the ground for potentially giving more-control to the DAO.

Governance and Community-Led Development

Aethir’s governance model promotes community-led decision-making in a very practical way. Instead of rushing with creation of a DAO for PR and marketing purposes Aethir is trying to make it the right way. They support projects building on their infrastructure and regularly share updates with their community in the most professional manner.

We believe Aethir would benefit from implementing reputation boosted voting. An example of such system is described here. The core assumption is to abandon the simplistic: 1 token = 1 vote and go towards: Votes = tokens * reputation_based_multiplication_factor.

In the attached example, reputation_based_multiplication_factor rises exponentially with the number of standard deviations above norm, with regard to user's rating. For compute compute providers at Aethir, user's rating could be replaced by provider's uptime.

Perspectives for the future

While it's important to analyze aspects such as supply-side tokenomics, or governance, we must keep in mind that 95% of project's success depends on demand-side. In this regard the outlook for Aethir may be very bright. The project declares $36M annual reccuring revenue. Revenue like this is very rare in the web3 space. Many projects are not able to generate any revenue after succesfull ICO event, due to lack fo product-market-fit.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

Quadratic Voting in Web3

Kajetan Olas

04 Dec 2024
Quadratic Voting in Web3

Decentralized systems are reshaping how we interact, conduct transactions, and govern online communities. As Web3 continues to advance, the necessity for effective and fair voting mechanisms becomes apparent. Traditional voting systems, such as the one-token-one-vote model, often fall short in capturing the intensity of individual preferences, which can result in centralization. Quadratic Voting (QV) addresses this challenge by enabling individuals to express not only their choices but also the strength of their preferences.

In QV, voters are allocated a budget of credits that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The cost of casting multiple votes on a single issue increases quadratically, meaning that each additional vote costs more than the last. This system allows for a more precise expression of preferences, as individuals can invest more heavily in issues they care deeply about while conserving credits on matters of lesser importance.

Understanding Quadratic Voting

Quadratic Voting (QV) is a voting system designed to capture not only the choices of individuals but also the strength of their preferences. In most DAO voting mechanisms, each person typically has one vote per token, which limits the ability to express how strongly they feel about a particular matter. Furthermore, QV limits the power of whales and founding team who typically have large token allocations. These problems are adressed by making the cost of each additional vote increase quadratically.

In QV, each voter is given a budget of credits or tokens that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The key principle is that the cost to cast n votes on a single issue is proportional to the square of n. This quadratic cost function ensures that while voters can express stronger preferences, doing so requires a disproportionately higher expenditure of their voting credits. This mechanism discourages voters from concentrating all their influence on a single issue unless they feel very strongly about it. In the context of DAOs, it means that large holders will have a hard-time pushing through with a proposal if they'll try to do it on their own.

Practical Example

Consider a voter who has been allocated 25 voting credits to spend on several proposals. The voter has varying degrees of interest in three proposals: Proposal A, Proposal B, and Proposal C.

  • Proposal A: High interest.
  • Proposal B: Moderate interest.
  • Proposal C: Low interest.

The voter might allocate their credits as follows:

Proposal A:

  • Votes cast: 3
  • Cost: 9 delegated tokens

Proposal B:

  • Votes cast: 2
  • Cost: 4 delegated tokens

Proposal C:

  • Votes cast: 1
  • Cost: 1 delegated token

Total delegated tokens: 14
Remaining tokens: 11

With the remaining tokens, the voter can choose to allocate additional votes to the proposals based on their preferences or save for future proposals. If they feel particularly strong about Proposal A, they might decide to cast one more vote:

Additional vote on Proposal A:

  • New total votes: 4
  • New cost: 16 delegated tokens
  • Additional cost: 16−9 = 7 delegated tokens

Updated total delegated tokens: 14+7 = 21

Updated remaining tokens: 25−21 = 425 - 21 = 4

This additional vote on Proposal A costs 7 credits, significantly more than the previous vote, illustrating how the quadratic cost discourages excessive influence on a single issue without strong conviction.

Benefits of Implementing Quadratic Voting

Key Characteristics of the Quadratic Cost Function

  • Marginal Cost Increases Linearly: The marginal cost of each additional vote increases linearly. The cost difference between casting n and n−1 votes is 2n−1.
  • Total Cost Increases Quadratically: The total cost to cast multiple votes rises steeply, discouraging voters from concentrating too many votes on a single issue without significant reason.
  • Promotes Egalitarian Voting: Small voters are encouraged to participate, because relatively they have a much higher impact.

Advantages Over Traditional Voting Systems

Quadratic Voting offers several benefits compared to traditional one-person-one-vote systems:

  • Captures Preference Intensity: By allowing voters to express how strongly they feel about an issue, QV leads to outcomes that better reflect the collective welfare.
  • Reduces Majority Domination: The quadratic cost makes it costly for majority groups to overpower minority interests on every issue.
  • Encourages Honest Voting: Voters are incentivized to allocate votes in proportion to their true preferences, reducing manipulation.

By understanding the foundation of Quadratic Voting, stakeholders in Web3 communities can appreciate how this system supports more representative governance.

Conclusion

Quadratic voting is a novel voting system that may be used within DAOs to foster decentralization. The key idea is to make the cost of voting on a certain issue increase quadratically. The leading player that makes use of this mechanism is Optimism. If you're pondering about the design of your DAO, we highly recommend taking a look at their research on quadratic funding.

If you're looking to create a robust governance model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure that your DAO will stand out as a beacon of innovation and resilience in the long term.