Privacy-Enhancing Technologies in Cryptocurrencies: Mimblewimble, Zcash, and Monero

Karolina

05 Jun 2023
Privacy-Enhancing Technologies in Cryptocurrencies: Mimblewimble, Zcash, and Monero

In the realm of cryptocurrencies, where public ledgers document transactions, privacy is a primary concern. Consequently, privacy-enhancing technologies have surfaced to grant users heightened confidentiality and anonymity. This article delves into three notable privacy-enhancing technologies: Mimblewimble, Zcash, and Monero. Utilizing groundbreaking methods, these technologies defend user privacy and amplify the security of cryptocurrency transactions. Comprehending these technologies allows individuals and businesses to make educated choices regarding their cryptocurrency utilization while protecting their sensitive data.

What are Privacy-Enhancing Technologies?

Privacy and Cryptocurrencies

In the context of cryptocurrencies, privacy is of paramount importance. The essence of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin lies in their decentralized nature and the anonymity they can potentially offer. However, many popular cryptocurrencies aren't as private as one might think. For instance, Bitcoin transactions are publicly recorded on the blockchain, and while they are associated with pseudonymous addresses, various techniques can potentially link these addresses to the identities of individuals.

A key concern for many users is the potential for their transaction history to become publicly accessible, an issue that can lead to a variety of problems, such as exposure to targeted advertising, identity theft, or even more serious personal security threats. Therefore, enhancing privacy is a critical issue in the cryptocurrency world.

Understanding Privacy-Enhancing Technologies

Privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) in the context of cryptocurrencies are tools, protocols, and technologies designed to protect users' personal information and ensure the privacy of their transactions. They aim to reduce or eliminate the risk of unauthorized access to data, ensuring that transactions remain confidential and that users' identities are protected.

PETs can be applied at different levels and in various ways within a cryptocurrency system. They can protect the content of transactions, obscure the identity of the parties involved, or even hide the fact that a transaction took place at all.

Different cryptocurrencies implement different types of PETs, each with its own benefits and trade-offs. For instance, some may offer stronger privacy guarantees but at the cost of increased computational resources, while others may offer a balance between privacy and efficiency. The key is to choose the right tool for the job, and that's where understanding the nuances of these technologies becomes essential.

In the following sections, we will explore three distinct privacy-enhancing technologies used in Mimblewimble, Zcash, and Monero, each offering unique mechanisms to ensure transaction privacy.

Mimblewimble: Privacy Through Transaction Aggregation

What is Mimblewimble?

Mimblewimble is a privacy and fungibility-focused blockchain protocol that was introduced to the cryptocurrency community in 2016. Named after a spell from the Harry Potter series, Mimblewimble enables the creation of cryptocurrencies that enhance privacy by using a different approach to transaction structure than most other blockchains.

Rather than recording individual transactions with distinct inputs and outputs, Mimblewimble aggregates transactions, effectively 'mixing' them together. This novel approach is achieved without compromising the integrity or security of transactions, making it a fascinating case study in privacy-enhancing technologies.

How Mimblewimble Enhances Privacy

Mimblewimble achieves its privacy enhancements through a few key mechanisms. These include:

  • Transaction aggregation: In a Mimblewimble-based blockchain, transactions are aggregated together before being added to a block. The aggregation process removes the separation between individual transactions, making it impossible to trace a particular transaction within a block.
  • No addresses: Mimblewimble doesn't use traditional cryptocurrency addresses. Instead, two parties communicate directly with each other to construct a transaction, which is then broadcast to the network. This approach prevents the linkage of transactions to particular addresses, enhancing privacy.
  • Confidential Transactions: Mimblewimble uses a cryptographic technique known as Confidential Transactions. This technique hides the amount of value being transferred in each transaction, further obfuscating the transaction details from outside observers.

Despite its privacy benefits, Mimblewimble also has its trade-offs. For instance, the absence of addresses means that Mimblewimble cannot support scripts or smart contracts in their traditional form. However, for users and applications seeking strong transaction privacy, Mimblewimble offers a compelling solution.

Zcash: Privacy Through zk-SNARKs

What is Zcash?

Zcash is a privacy-focused cryptocurrency that was launched in 2016. Built on a codebase similar to Bitcoin's, Zcash distinguishes itself by its innovative use of privacy-enhancing technologies, particularly a cryptographic concept known as zk-SNARKs (Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge).

Zcash provides an option for users to choose between "transparent" transactions, which work similarly to Bitcoin, and "shielded" transactions, which offer enhanced privacy. This flexibility allows users to balance their needs for transparency and privacy as required.

How Zcash Enhances Privacy

Zcash's key privacy feature is its use of zk-SNARKs. These are proofs that allow one party to prove to another that a statement is true, without revealing any additional information beyond the truth of the statement itself. Here's how zk-SNARKs are used to enhance privacy in Zcash:

  • Shielded Transactions: In a shielded transaction, the sender, receiver, and transaction amount are all encrypted. Despite this encryption, the network can verify that the transaction is valid using zk-SNARKs, without gaining any information about the transaction's details.
  • Selective Disclosure: Zcash also allows for selective disclosure. This means that a user can choose to reveal some details about a transaction, such as the amount or the parties involved, to certain individuals or entities. This feature can be useful for auditing purposes or to comply with regulatory requirements.

Zcash, through its innovative use of zk-SNARKs, offers robust privacy options for users. However, it's worth noting that the privacy features of Zcash are optional and must be actively chosen by users. Additionally, creating shielded transactions requires more computational resources than transparent transactions, which can be a consideration for users. Nonetheless, for those requiring strong privacy protections, Zcash's use of zk-SNARKs provides a powerful tool.

Read our Ultimate Guide to Zero-Knowledge Proofs: zk-SNARKs vs zk-STARKs

Monero: Privacy Through Ring Signatures and Stealth Addresses

What is Monero?

Monero, launched in 2014, is a cryptocurrency that places a strong focus on privacy, decentralization, and fungibility. Unlike some cryptocurrencies where privacy is an optional feature, Monero is designed to provide privacy by default. Monero's blockchain is constructed in such a way that no observer can tell the source, amount, or destination of transactions.

Monero achieves this high level of privacy through the use of several innovative technologies. Those include ring signatures, ring confidential transactions, and stealth addresses.

How Monero Enhances Privacy

Monero's privacy enhancements can be attributed to a combination of unique features and technologies:

Ring Signatures: This technology is used to protect the sender's identity. A ring signature is a type of digital signature where a transaction is signed and verified by a group of potential signers, forming a "ring". This approach obscures the identity of the actual signer, making it virtually impossible to determine who the actual sender of a given transaction is.

Ring Confidential Transactions (RingCT): RingCT is an extension of the concept of ring signatures. In addition to hiding the sender's identity, RingCT also conceals the transaction amount, adding another layer of privacy to Monero transactions.

Stealth Addresses: Monero uses stealth addresses to protect the receiver's identity. When a transaction is made, a one-time address is created for the recipient. This address is not linked to the actual address of the recipient, thereby protecting their privacy.

Despite its strong privacy features, Monero also comes with its own set of trade-offs. For instance, due to its privacy mechanisms, the Monero blockchain is significantly larger than that of other cryptocurrencies, which can lead to issues related to storage and synchronization. Nevertheless, for those who value privacy above all else in their transactions, Monero offers one of the most comprehensive solutions in the cryptocurrency space.

Conclusion

To sum up, addressing privacy concerns related to cryptocurrencies is made possible through privacy-enhancing technologies like Mimblewimble, Zcash, and Monero. These technologies implement unique approaches to preserve user privacy and bolster transaction security. By focusing on transaction aggregation in Mimblewimble, employing zk-SNARKs for shielded transactions in Zcash, and utilizing ring signatures alongside stealth addresses in Monero, individuals and businesses can comprehend these technologies and make educated decisions to safeguard their sensitive data while interacting with cryptocurrencies.

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Kajetan Olas

22 Nov 2024
Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Authors of the contents are not affiliated to the reviewed project in any way and none of the information presented should be taken as financial advice.

In this article we analyze tokenomics of Aethir - a project providing on-demand cloud compute resources for the AI, Gaming, and virtualized compute sectors.
Aethir aims to aggregate enterprise-grade GPUs from multiple providers into a DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network). Its competitive edge comes from utlizing the GPUs for very specific use-cases, such as low-latency rendering for online games.
Due to decentralized nature of its infrastructure Aethir can meet the demands of online-gaming in any region. This is especially important for some gamer-abundant regions in Asia with underdeveloped cloud infrastructure that causes high latency ("lags").
We will analyze Aethir's tokenomics, give our opinion on what was done well, and provide specific recommendations on how to improve it.

Evaluation Summary

Aethir Tokenomics Structure

The total supply of ATH tokens is capped at 42 billion ATH. This fixed cap provides a predictable supply environment, and the complete emissions schedule is listed here. As of November 2024 there are approximately 5.2 Billion ATH in circulation. In a year from now (November 2025), the circulating supply will almost triple, and will amount to approximately 15 Billion ATH. By November 2028, today's circulating supply will be diluted by around 86%.

From an investor standpoint the rational decision would be to stake their tokens and hope for rewards that will balance the inflation. Currently the estimated APR for 3-year staking is 195% and for 4-year staking APR is 261%. The rewards are paid out weekly. Furthermore, stakers can expect to get additional rewards from partnered AI projects.

Staking Incentives

Rewards are calculated based on the staking duration and staked amount. These factors are equally important and they linearly influence weekly rewards. This means that someone who stakes 100 ATH for 2 weeks will have the same weekly rewards as someone who stakes 200 ATH for 1 week. This mechanism greatly emphasizes long-term holding. That's because holding a token makes sense only if you go for long-term staking. E.g. a whale staking $200k with 1 week lockup. will have the same weekly rewards as person staking $1k with 4 year lockup. Furthermore the ATH staking rewards are fixed and divided among stakers. Therefore Increase of user base is likely to come with decrease in rewards.
We believe the main weak-point of Aethirs staking is the lack of equivalency between rewards paid out to the users and value generated for the protocol as a result of staking.

Token Distribution

The token distribution of $ATH is well designed and comes with long vesting time-frames. 18-month cliff and 36-moths subsequent linear vesting is applied to team's allocation. This is higher than industry standard and is a sign of long-term commitment.

  • Checkers and Compute Providers: 50%
  • Ecosystem: 15%
  • Team: 12.5%
  • Investors: 11.5%
  • Airdrop: 6%
  • Advisors: 5%

Aethir's airdrop is divided into 3 phases to ensure that only loyal users get rewarded. This mechanism is very-well thought and we rate it highly. It fosters high community engagement within the first months of the project and sets the ground for potentially giving more-control to the DAO.

Governance and Community-Led Development

Aethir’s governance model promotes community-led decision-making in a very practical way. Instead of rushing with creation of a DAO for PR and marketing purposes Aethir is trying to make it the right way. They support projects building on their infrastructure and regularly share updates with their community in the most professional manner.

We believe Aethir would benefit from implementing reputation boosted voting. An example of such system is described here. The core assumption is to abandon the simplistic: 1 token = 1 vote and go towards: Votes = tokens * reputation_based_multiplication_factor.

In the attached example, reputation_based_multiplication_factor rises exponentially with the number of standard deviations above norm, with regard to user's rating. For compute compute providers at Aethir, user's rating could be replaced by provider's uptime.

Perspectives for the future

While it's important to analyze aspects such as supply-side tokenomics, or governance, we must keep in mind that 95% of project's success depends on demand-side. In this regard the outlook for Aethir may be very bright. The project declares $36M annual reccuring revenue. Revenue like this is very rare in the web3 space. Many projects are not able to generate any revenue after succesfull ICO event, due to lack fo product-market-fit.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

Quadratic Voting in Web3

Kajetan Olas

04 Dec 2024
Quadratic Voting in Web3

Decentralized systems are reshaping how we interact, conduct transactions, and govern online communities. As Web3 continues to advance, the necessity for effective and fair voting mechanisms becomes apparent. Traditional voting systems, such as the one-token-one-vote model, often fall short in capturing the intensity of individual preferences, which can result in centralization. Quadratic Voting (QV) addresses this challenge by enabling individuals to express not only their choices but also the strength of their preferences.

In QV, voters are allocated a budget of credits that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The cost of casting multiple votes on a single issue increases quadratically, meaning that each additional vote costs more than the last. This system allows for a more precise expression of preferences, as individuals can invest more heavily in issues they care deeply about while conserving credits on matters of lesser importance.

Understanding Quadratic Voting

Quadratic Voting (QV) is a voting system designed to capture not only the choices of individuals but also the strength of their preferences. In most DAO voting mechanisms, each person typically has one vote per token, which limits the ability to express how strongly they feel about a particular matter. Furthermore, QV limits the power of whales and founding team who typically have large token allocations. These problems are adressed by making the cost of each additional vote increase quadratically.

In QV, each voter is given a budget of credits or tokens that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The key principle is that the cost to cast n votes on a single issue is proportional to the square of n. This quadratic cost function ensures that while voters can express stronger preferences, doing so requires a disproportionately higher expenditure of their voting credits. This mechanism discourages voters from concentrating all their influence on a single issue unless they feel very strongly about it. In the context of DAOs, it means that large holders will have a hard-time pushing through with a proposal if they'll try to do it on their own.

Practical Example

Consider a voter who has been allocated 25 voting credits to spend on several proposals. The voter has varying degrees of interest in three proposals: Proposal A, Proposal B, and Proposal C.

  • Proposal A: High interest.
  • Proposal B: Moderate interest.
  • Proposal C: Low interest.

The voter might allocate their credits as follows:

Proposal A:

  • Votes cast: 3
  • Cost: 9 delegated tokens

Proposal B:

  • Votes cast: 2
  • Cost: 4 delegated tokens

Proposal C:

  • Votes cast: 1
  • Cost: 1 delegated token

Total delegated tokens: 14
Remaining tokens: 11

With the remaining tokens, the voter can choose to allocate additional votes to the proposals based on their preferences or save for future proposals. If they feel particularly strong about Proposal A, they might decide to cast one more vote:

Additional vote on Proposal A:

  • New total votes: 4
  • New cost: 16 delegated tokens
  • Additional cost: 16−9 = 7 delegated tokens

Updated total delegated tokens: 14+7 = 21

Updated remaining tokens: 25−21 = 425 - 21 = 4

This additional vote on Proposal A costs 7 credits, significantly more than the previous vote, illustrating how the quadratic cost discourages excessive influence on a single issue without strong conviction.

Benefits of Implementing Quadratic Voting

Key Characteristics of the Quadratic Cost Function

  • Marginal Cost Increases Linearly: The marginal cost of each additional vote increases linearly. The cost difference between casting n and n−1 votes is 2n−1.
  • Total Cost Increases Quadratically: The total cost to cast multiple votes rises steeply, discouraging voters from concentrating too many votes on a single issue without significant reason.
  • Promotes Egalitarian Voting: Small voters are encouraged to participate, because relatively they have a much higher impact.

Advantages Over Traditional Voting Systems

Quadratic Voting offers several benefits compared to traditional one-person-one-vote systems:

  • Captures Preference Intensity: By allowing voters to express how strongly they feel about an issue, QV leads to outcomes that better reflect the collective welfare.
  • Reduces Majority Domination: The quadratic cost makes it costly for majority groups to overpower minority interests on every issue.
  • Encourages Honest Voting: Voters are incentivized to allocate votes in proportion to their true preferences, reducing manipulation.

By understanding the foundation of Quadratic Voting, stakeholders in Web3 communities can appreciate how this system supports more representative governance.

Conclusion

Quadratic voting is a novel voting system that may be used within DAOs to foster decentralization. The key idea is to make the cost of voting on a certain issue increase quadratically. The leading player that makes use of this mechanism is Optimism. If you're pondering about the design of your DAO, we highly recommend taking a look at their research on quadratic funding.

If you're looking to create a robust governance model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure that your DAO will stand out as a beacon of innovation and resilience in the long term.