DAO legal structure and regulatory challenges: Navigating the uncharted territory

Karolina

18 May 2023
DAO legal structure and regulatory challenges: Navigating the uncharted territory

In recent years, the blockchain space has experienced a surge in popularity for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations, also known as DAOs. Operating through smart contracts on blockchain networks, these organizations are designed with transparency, decentralization, and autonomy in mind. The potential of DAOs to revolutionize traditional business and organizational models exists, yet it also brings forth distinct legal and regulatory issues. With the growing popularity of DAOs, it has become crucial to establish legal frameworks that regulate their functioning, creating a need for a clear "DAO legal structure."

Nonetheless, the legal aspects concerning DAOs are intricate and demand an in-depth comprehension of both blockchain technology and conventional legal systems. Presently, the prevailing legal frameworks for classic business entities such as limited liability companies and corporations do not directly apply to DAOs. This situation poses a challenge for regulators and DAO operators since there isn't an evident legal precedent concerning DAOs. In the following section, we will delve into the existing legal frameworks for DAOs. 

DAO Legal structures

DAOs utilize decentralized networks yet often need a legal structure for compliance and traditional system interaction. Various structures are available, each with unique benefits and factors. Common DAO legal structures include:

  • Limited Liability Company (LLC): By forming an LLC, a DAO gains a defined legal framework and limited liability for members. It enables participants to establish ownership, roles, and responsibilities while maintaining legal protection.
  • Cooperative Association: As another alternative, forming a cooperative association enables members to collectively own and operate the DAO. This model promotes democratic decision-making and profit-sharing, adhering to cooperative principles.
  • Non-Profit Organization: Philanthropic or community-focused DAOs may adopt a non-profit structure. This allows them to pursue charitable goals, access tax-exempt status, and use existing non-profit regulations.
  • Foundation: Some DAOs choose foundation structures, prevalent in crypto and blockchain fields. Foundations offer governance, resource allocation, and community management frameworks while pursuing specific goals like developing decentralized tech or promoting causes.

It's crucial to understand that each legal structure's suitability for a DAO depends on its objectives, jurisdiction, and operations.

Would you like to read about Smart Contracts Security Audits? Be sure to check out our article!

The advent of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) has been met with varying legal responses across the globe. Wyoming led the charge in the United States by recognizing DAOs as limited liability companies (LLCs) in 2021. This ground-breaking move has since inspired other states like Tennessee to revise their corporate codes to include provisions for decentralized organizations.

Switzerland, known for its forward-thinking approach to cryptocurrency and blockchain regulation, has also considered recognizing DAOs as legal entities. The Swiss Federal Council has pondered creating a unique legal entity specifically for DAOs, which could help integrate them within the purview of Swiss law.

Meanwhile, the Island of Jersey has introduced a hybrid entity – the Jersey Limited Liability Company (LLC), inspired by the LLC models of Cayman and Delaware. These LLCs are increasingly being used as legal wrappers for DAOs, effectively merging conventional legal structures with decentralized organization models. This innovative approach allows DAOs to benefit from the well-established legal structure of LLCs while simultaneously leveraging the advantages of blockchain technology and smart contracts.

In the United Kingdom, the government has tasked the Law Commission with the responsibility of studying DAOs. Given their growing relevance in the crypto-token and decentralized finance sectors, understanding DAOs' unique characteristics and potential legal implications is critical. The 15-month study aims to understand DAOs' legal treatment under English and Welsh law, their structure, and operation, along with potential legal barriers. The project aligns with the UK's broader ambition of becoming a global hub for crypto-asset technology, and clarifying the legal status of DAOs within the UK is an integral part of this vision.

For more on the legal aspects of Dao, read this

Are you wondering what legal structure to give your DAO? Read these questions, they may help you think through important issues

Should you form a DAO?  If your project doesn't require blockchain and decentralization, creating a DAO may not be beneficial, and another organizational structure could be more appropriate.

Is a legal entity structure necessary for your DAO? Legal entities often possess greater capabilities than those without entities. Some benefits include: managing community-controlled treasuries with ease, owning assets and intellectual property, employing people and generating income, and collaborating with external organizations. Essentially, legal entity status grants a DAO legal existence, reduces participant liability, and assists in determining and fulfilling tax obligations. Although no perfect legal entity structure exists for the majority of DAOs, selecting an appropriate one can help reduce risks.

What kind of DAO are you creating? The DAO's purpose will frequently direct the most fitting legal structure; however, no universal solution exists. A network/protocol overseeing DAO may not be adequate for other types of DAOs. Investment-focused DAOs might fare well as LLCs, similarly to numerous existing investment clubs. Collector, social or charitable DAOs could function better as LLCs or UNAs based on their specific circumstances. Meanwhile, cooperative and collective DAOs might find LCAs suitable—a format utilized by many existing co-ops. When determining a DAO's legal entity, referring to frameworks for existing analogues can be helpful.

In the case of network/protocol DAOs, consider the following: does significant U.S. membership or activity exist? Does the DAO control network/protocol income or a treasury? If none of these factors apply, an Entityless structure might be a suitable choice. However, if any one of these conditions is met, the DAO's activities may lead to U.S. tax obligations for the DAO or its members. Opting for U.S. entity structures is recommended as the most straightforward method of satisfying these obligations.

For the visually oriented, here’s guide in the form of a decision tree made by a16zcrypto

Conclusion

The global adoption of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) has begun to impact existing legal frameworks. As DAOs gain popularity, it becomes increasingly essential to establish clear legal structures that accommodate their unique characteristics. Although the traditional legal frameworks for business entities do not directly apply to DAOs, multiple legal structures such as LLCs, cooperative associations, non-profit organizations, and foundations can still provide some compliance and interaction with conventional systems. Innovations in legislation, like those seen in Wyoming and Jersey, demonstrate growing efforts to integrate decentralized organizations into existing legal contexts. While countries like Switzerland and the United Kingdom explore the possibility of new legal entities or study existing laws' adaptability, it is evident that DAO's legal and regulatory landscape is constantly evolving. Stakeholders must remain informed of these developments to navigate the uncharted territory of DAO legal structure and regulatory challenges successfully.

Tagi

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Kajetan Olas

22 Nov 2024
Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Authors of the contents are not affiliated to the reviewed project in any way and none of the information presented should be taken as financial advice.

In this article we analyze tokenomics of Aethir - a project providing on-demand cloud compute resources for the AI, Gaming, and virtualized compute sectors.
Aethir aims to aggregate enterprise-grade GPUs from multiple providers into a DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network). Its competitive edge comes from utlizing the GPUs for very specific use-cases, such as low-latency rendering for online games.
Due to decentralized nature of its infrastructure Aethir can meet the demands of online-gaming in any region. This is especially important for some gamer-abundant regions in Asia with underdeveloped cloud infrastructure that causes high latency ("lags").
We will analyze Aethir's tokenomics, give our opinion on what was done well, and provide specific recommendations on how to improve it.

Evaluation Summary

Aethir Tokenomics Structure

The total supply of ATH tokens is capped at 42 billion ATH. This fixed cap provides a predictable supply environment, and the complete emissions schedule is listed here. As of November 2024 there are approximately 5.2 Billion ATH in circulation. In a year from now (November 2025), the circulating supply will almost triple, and will amount to approximately 15 Billion ATH. By November 2028, today's circulating supply will be diluted by around 86%.

From an investor standpoint the rational decision would be to stake their tokens and hope for rewards that will balance the inflation. Currently the estimated APR for 3-year staking is 195% and for 4-year staking APR is 261%. The rewards are paid out weekly. Furthermore, stakers can expect to get additional rewards from partnered AI projects.

Staking Incentives

Rewards are calculated based on the staking duration and staked amount. These factors are equally important and they linearly influence weekly rewards. This means that someone who stakes 100 ATH for 2 weeks will have the same weekly rewards as someone who stakes 200 ATH for 1 week. This mechanism greatly emphasizes long-term holding. That's because holding a token makes sense only if you go for long-term staking. E.g. a whale staking $200k with 1 week lockup. will have the same weekly rewards as person staking $1k with 4 year lockup. Furthermore the ATH staking rewards are fixed and divided among stakers. Therefore Increase of user base is likely to come with decrease in rewards.
We believe the main weak-point of Aethirs staking is the lack of equivalency between rewards paid out to the users and value generated for the protocol as a result of staking.

Token Distribution

The token distribution of $ATH is well designed and comes with long vesting time-frames. 18-month cliff and 36-moths subsequent linear vesting is applied to team's allocation. This is higher than industry standard and is a sign of long-term commitment.

  • Checkers and Compute Providers: 50%
  • Ecosystem: 15%
  • Team: 12.5%
  • Investors: 11.5%
  • Airdrop: 6%
  • Advisors: 5%

Aethir's airdrop is divided into 3 phases to ensure that only loyal users get rewarded. This mechanism is very-well thought and we rate it highly. It fosters high community engagement within the first months of the project and sets the ground for potentially giving more-control to the DAO.

Governance and Community-Led Development

Aethir’s governance model promotes community-led decision-making in a very practical way. Instead of rushing with creation of a DAO for PR and marketing purposes Aethir is trying to make it the right way. They support projects building on their infrastructure and regularly share updates with their community in the most professional manner.

We believe Aethir would benefit from implementing reputation boosted voting. An example of such system is described here. The core assumption is to abandon the simplistic: 1 token = 1 vote and go towards: Votes = tokens * reputation_based_multiplication_factor.

In the attached example, reputation_based_multiplication_factor rises exponentially with the number of standard deviations above norm, with regard to user's rating. For compute compute providers at Aethir, user's rating could be replaced by provider's uptime.

Perspectives for the future

While it's important to analyze aspects such as supply-side tokenomics, or governance, we must keep in mind that 95% of project's success depends on demand-side. In this regard the outlook for Aethir may be very bright. The project declares $36M annual reccuring revenue. Revenue like this is very rare in the web3 space. Many projects are not able to generate any revenue after succesfull ICO event, due to lack fo product-market-fit.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

Quadratic Voting in Web3

Kajetan Olas

04 Dec 2024
Quadratic Voting in Web3

Decentralized systems are reshaping how we interact, conduct transactions, and govern online communities. As Web3 continues to advance, the necessity for effective and fair voting mechanisms becomes apparent. Traditional voting systems, such as the one-token-one-vote model, often fall short in capturing the intensity of individual preferences, which can result in centralization. Quadratic Voting (QV) addresses this challenge by enabling individuals to express not only their choices but also the strength of their preferences.

In QV, voters are allocated a budget of credits that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The cost of casting multiple votes on a single issue increases quadratically, meaning that each additional vote costs more than the last. This system allows for a more precise expression of preferences, as individuals can invest more heavily in issues they care deeply about while conserving credits on matters of lesser importance.

Understanding Quadratic Voting

Quadratic Voting (QV) is a voting system designed to capture not only the choices of individuals but also the strength of their preferences. In most DAO voting mechanisms, each person typically has one vote per token, which limits the ability to express how strongly they feel about a particular matter. Furthermore, QV limits the power of whales and founding team who typically have large token allocations. These problems are adressed by making the cost of each additional vote increase quadratically.

In QV, each voter is given a budget of credits or tokens that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The key principle is that the cost to cast n votes on a single issue is proportional to the square of n. This quadratic cost function ensures that while voters can express stronger preferences, doing so requires a disproportionately higher expenditure of their voting credits. This mechanism discourages voters from concentrating all their influence on a single issue unless they feel very strongly about it. In the context of DAOs, it means that large holders will have a hard-time pushing through with a proposal if they'll try to do it on their own.

Practical Example

Consider a voter who has been allocated 25 voting credits to spend on several proposals. The voter has varying degrees of interest in three proposals: Proposal A, Proposal B, and Proposal C.

  • Proposal A: High interest.
  • Proposal B: Moderate interest.
  • Proposal C: Low interest.

The voter might allocate their credits as follows:

Proposal A:

  • Votes cast: 3
  • Cost: 9 delegated tokens

Proposal B:

  • Votes cast: 2
  • Cost: 4 delegated tokens

Proposal C:

  • Votes cast: 1
  • Cost: 1 delegated token

Total delegated tokens: 14
Remaining tokens: 11

With the remaining tokens, the voter can choose to allocate additional votes to the proposals based on their preferences or save for future proposals. If they feel particularly strong about Proposal A, they might decide to cast one more vote:

Additional vote on Proposal A:

  • New total votes: 4
  • New cost: 16 delegated tokens
  • Additional cost: 16−9 = 7 delegated tokens

Updated total delegated tokens: 14+7 = 21

Updated remaining tokens: 25−21 = 425 - 21 = 4

This additional vote on Proposal A costs 7 credits, significantly more than the previous vote, illustrating how the quadratic cost discourages excessive influence on a single issue without strong conviction.

Benefits of Implementing Quadratic Voting

Key Characteristics of the Quadratic Cost Function

  • Marginal Cost Increases Linearly: The marginal cost of each additional vote increases linearly. The cost difference between casting n and n−1 votes is 2n−1.
  • Total Cost Increases Quadratically: The total cost to cast multiple votes rises steeply, discouraging voters from concentrating too many votes on a single issue without significant reason.
  • Promotes Egalitarian Voting: Small voters are encouraged to participate, because relatively they have a much higher impact.

Advantages Over Traditional Voting Systems

Quadratic Voting offers several benefits compared to traditional one-person-one-vote systems:

  • Captures Preference Intensity: By allowing voters to express how strongly they feel about an issue, QV leads to outcomes that better reflect the collective welfare.
  • Reduces Majority Domination: The quadratic cost makes it costly for majority groups to overpower minority interests on every issue.
  • Encourages Honest Voting: Voters are incentivized to allocate votes in proportion to their true preferences, reducing manipulation.

By understanding the foundation of Quadratic Voting, stakeholders in Web3 communities can appreciate how this system supports more representative governance.

Conclusion

Quadratic voting is a novel voting system that may be used within DAOs to foster decentralization. The key idea is to make the cost of voting on a certain issue increase quadratically. The leading player that makes use of this mechanism is Optimism. If you're pondering about the design of your DAO, we highly recommend taking a look at their research on quadratic funding.

If you're looking to create a robust governance model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure that your DAO will stand out as a beacon of innovation and resilience in the long term.