How much does tokenization cost?

Maciej Zieliński

05 Apr 2022
How much does tokenization cost?

Tokenization is a form of business digitization that is based on blockchain technology. It allows for the creation of tokens or coins and is used to assign their values to a given project. Due to the growth of the cryptocurrency sector and the adoption of blockchain technology, the potential for tokenizing business has increased. Smart contracts enabled full payment automation, which significantly accelerated the process of collecting funds and handling all types of ICO. Why is business tokenization worthwhile? What are the benefits and costs of tokenization? We're writing about it all below!

Tokenization of business

Many business entities are planning to proceed with the tokenization of their business activities. Unfortunately, few people know what the costs associated with this type of action are. In addition, the resulting tokens are often confused with cryptocurrencies. Although both forms are intangible, they use blockchain technology in different ways. Cryptocurrencies have their blokchain, and tokens use out-of-the-box solutions and classic technologies. In addition, it should be noted that tokens can be divided into 3 categories:

  • utility tokens
  • security tokens
  • payment tokens

Many companies use these forms to recapitalize their current business or to start a new business. This brings with it some benefits, but also costs.

What are the benefits and costs of tokenization?

The following is a list of the tangible and intangible benefits of implementing tokenization.

Tangible benefits and potential costs:

  • Legal aspects - Can legal costs save you money on the first day? No, but will it save the issuer and investors many millions of dollars in the event of a large collection? Definitely yes. Tokenization does not need lawyers to assign and link ownership in a project. Tokenization occurs automatically with smart contracts. However, you need to take into account that good tokenization needs to have a meaningful white paper, which often requires technical and legal knowledge. The potential cost of preparing a good white paper starts at $5 000.
  • Blockchain technology — using new technologies to implement your tokenization. We must remember that, depending on the law of the country concerned, additional costs related to the implementation of Know Your Customer (KYC) and AML procedures (prevention of money laundering) may arise. Other costs includes the potential requirements and licenses that are required for trading and collection of digital securities. Such costs are not schematic and may range from a few to several thousand dollars.
  • Automated compatibility — thanks to blockchain technology and smart contracts, we have a wealth of information that cannot be forged. Thus, we save money that we would otherwise have to spend on keeping financial accounting records. Lock-up periods, number of investors, and other policies and regulations may be embedded in or next to digital securities, allowing them to automatically track and enforce the law depending on the jurisdiction. Smart contracts and blockchain technology can save around $150.000 - $200.000 over the span of 5 years of running a business.
  • Time — this is an element which concerns the management’s focus on the tokenization process. Each member managing the project and working in it sacrifices his time and receives remuneration for it. The rates for an hour of a Blockchain Specialist‘s work start at $50. Smart contracts help us save a lot of money, but we need to be aware that implementing tokenization will cost between a few and several thousand dollars in employee remuneration.
  • Administration costs — these are office costs, customer service costs and documentation workflow costs, as well as costs related with any and all formalities. To conduct an ICO, you will need a service that involves organizing financial documents and collecting required licenses. The costs in this case can be between a few and several thousand dollars.
  • Distributions and payments — At the moment, in the case of traditional securities, if a company has to issue a dividend, it passes through transfer agents who usually send checks to investors. The process can be slow and inefficient. The use of blockchain technology allows a registered transfer agent to issue dividends to shareholders immediately with a single click. Additionally, tokenization occurs automatically thanks to smart contacts.
  • The main cost for business tokenization is IT. IT services are the most expensive issue in ICO. The software itself can cost tens of thousands of PLN. On top of that, there are also the costs related to expertise in IT, blockchain and payments. Each project must be individually designed graphically. That is why IT costs are so high.

Intangible benefits and associated costs

Intangible benefits of ICO will mentally help us manage financial collections more efficiently.

By paying the above mentioned ICO costs, we will achieve the following advantages:

  • Saving time – in the case of traditional securities, shares, bonds, etc. the time, money and energy invested in a business system that (in classic business) is slow and bureaucratic are a major problem. Running an ICO in combination with blockchain technology digitizes the whole process, eliminates paperwork and technical problems, and implements automated tools by using smart contracts.
  • Liquidity — The liquidity potential increases in the case of trading on the secondary market after a year, as opposed to waiting for a multi-annual exit, which is typical of traditional private offers. The entire process depends on specific legislation. Moreover, thanks to the market, crypto investors have the ability to trade all around the world 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with settlements being conducted in a much more efficient and transparent process.
  • Transparency — thanks to public blockchain technology, the investment process becomes much more transparent. All transaction information can be stored on a blockchain. These records protect both the investor and the issuer. Investors can be certain that their data is not compromised at any stage of the ICO. In the case of issuers, shareholder management and non-variable reporting of transactions are available as part of internal control or in the case of any regulatory supervision that may occur.
  • Security — blockchain technology blocks the possibility of counterfeiting and stealing funds. In addition, each transaction is unchangeable and provides decentralized protection of personal data, making the whole process extremely secure.
  • Fractionalisation — While real funds can already be divided into fractions, the current method may be inefficient. Digital securities offer an opportunity to streamline the process of fractionalising assets and revenues generated by them.

Summary

The fixed costs associated with the execution of ICO are significant and can range from tens to more than $100 000. If the project is exceptionally robust, then “sky is the limit” as far as financing the project is concerned. Although initially ICO may seem an expensive solution, over the span of 5 years the costs of running a business may be 40% lower than those generated by using traditional solutions. Since tokenization is still the driving force for generating capital, we believe that the cost and additional benefits will replace the current methods. Blockchain technology has the significant ability to improve the way securities are issued, traded, and managed. As the market matures, the benefits will certainly increase over time. This does not mean that we must or should completely abandon the older processes that exist in today's capital markets. Instead, we can combine these two systems to create effective, efficient and user-friendly solutions for the next generation of securities. ICO can be expensive, but the benefits resulting from it certainly outweigh a simple factor like “finance”.

Tokens are a great solution for many customers. Using blockchain technology ensures increased security. In addition, modern tools, payment technologies and the overal payments industry, as well as solutions such as google pay, apple pay, digital wallets, credit cards and the overall payment network aid with conducting payment tokenization of every project. The payment process itself is incredibly simple and safe. Payment data, sensitive data and recurring payments require the token service provider to conduct payment processing in a professional manner.

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Kajetan Olas

22 Nov 2024
Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Authors of the contents are not affiliated to the reviewed project in any way and none of the information presented should be taken as financial advice.

In this article we analyze tokenomics of Aethir - a project providing on-demand cloud compute resources for the AI, Gaming, and virtualized compute sectors.
Aethir aims to aggregate enterprise-grade GPUs from multiple providers into a DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network). Its competitive edge comes from utlizing the GPUs for very specific use-cases, such as low-latency rendering for online games.
Due to decentralized nature of its infrastructure Aethir can meet the demands of online-gaming in any region. This is especially important for some gamer-abundant regions in Asia with underdeveloped cloud infrastructure that causes high latency ("lags").
We will analyze Aethir's tokenomics, give our opinion on what was done well, and provide specific recommendations on how to improve it.

Evaluation Summary

Aethir Tokenomics Structure

The total supply of ATH tokens is capped at 42 billion ATH. This fixed cap provides a predictable supply environment, and the complete emissions schedule is listed here. As of November 2024 there are approximately 5.2 Billion ATH in circulation. In a year from now (November 2025), the circulating supply will almost triple, and will amount to approximately 15 Billion ATH. By November 2028, today's circulating supply will be diluted by around 86%.

From an investor standpoint the rational decision would be to stake their tokens and hope for rewards that will balance the inflation. Currently the estimated APR for 3-year staking is 195% and for 4-year staking APR is 261%. The rewards are paid out weekly. Furthermore, stakers can expect to get additional rewards from partnered AI projects.

Staking Incentives

Rewards are calculated based on the staking duration and staked amount. These factors are equally important and they linearly influence weekly rewards. This means that someone who stakes 100 ATH for 2 weeks will have the same weekly rewards as someone who stakes 200 ATH for 1 week. This mechanism greatly emphasizes long-term holding. That's because holding a token makes sense only if you go for long-term staking. E.g. a whale staking $200k with 1 week lockup. will have the same weekly rewards as person staking $1k with 4 year lockup. Furthermore the ATH staking rewards are fixed and divided among stakers. Therefore Increase of user base is likely to come with decrease in rewards.
We believe the main weak-point of Aethirs staking is the lack of equivalency between rewards paid out to the users and value generated for the protocol as a result of staking.

Token Distribution

The token distribution of $ATH is well designed and comes with long vesting time-frames. 18-month cliff and 36-moths subsequent linear vesting is applied to team's allocation. This is higher than industry standard and is a sign of long-term commitment.

  • Checkers and Compute Providers: 50%
  • Ecosystem: 15%
  • Team: 12.5%
  • Investors: 11.5%
  • Airdrop: 6%
  • Advisors: 5%

Aethir's airdrop is divided into 3 phases to ensure that only loyal users get rewarded. This mechanism is very-well thought and we rate it highly. It fosters high community engagement within the first months of the project and sets the ground for potentially giving more-control to the DAO.

Governance and Community-Led Development

Aethir’s governance model promotes community-led decision-making in a very practical way. Instead of rushing with creation of a DAO for PR and marketing purposes Aethir is trying to make it the right way. They support projects building on their infrastructure and regularly share updates with their community in the most professional manner.

We believe Aethir would benefit from implementing reputation boosted voting. An example of such system is described here. The core assumption is to abandon the simplistic: 1 token = 1 vote and go towards: Votes = tokens * reputation_based_multiplication_factor.

In the attached example, reputation_based_multiplication_factor rises exponentially with the number of standard deviations above norm, with regard to user's rating. For compute compute providers at Aethir, user's rating could be replaced by provider's uptime.

Perspectives for the future

While it's important to analyze aspects such as supply-side tokenomics, or governance, we must keep in mind that 95% of project's success depends on demand-side. In this regard the outlook for Aethir may be very bright. The project declares $36M annual reccuring revenue. Revenue like this is very rare in the web3 space. Many projects are not able to generate any revenue after succesfull ICO event, due to lack fo product-market-fit.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

Quadratic Voting in Web3

Kajetan Olas

04 Dec 2024
Quadratic Voting in Web3

Decentralized systems are reshaping how we interact, conduct transactions, and govern online communities. As Web3 continues to advance, the necessity for effective and fair voting mechanisms becomes apparent. Traditional voting systems, such as the one-token-one-vote model, often fall short in capturing the intensity of individual preferences, which can result in centralization. Quadratic Voting (QV) addresses this challenge by enabling individuals to express not only their choices but also the strength of their preferences.

In QV, voters are allocated a budget of credits that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The cost of casting multiple votes on a single issue increases quadratically, meaning that each additional vote costs more than the last. This system allows for a more precise expression of preferences, as individuals can invest more heavily in issues they care deeply about while conserving credits on matters of lesser importance.

Understanding Quadratic Voting

Quadratic Voting (QV) is a voting system designed to capture not only the choices of individuals but also the strength of their preferences. In most DAO voting mechanisms, each person typically has one vote per token, which limits the ability to express how strongly they feel about a particular matter. Furthermore, QV limits the power of whales and founding team who typically have large token allocations. These problems are adressed by making the cost of each additional vote increase quadratically.

In QV, each voter is given a budget of credits or tokens that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The key principle is that the cost to cast n votes on a single issue is proportional to the square of n. This quadratic cost function ensures that while voters can express stronger preferences, doing so requires a disproportionately higher expenditure of their voting credits. This mechanism discourages voters from concentrating all their influence on a single issue unless they feel very strongly about it. In the context of DAOs, it means that large holders will have a hard-time pushing through with a proposal if they'll try to do it on their own.

Practical Example

Consider a voter who has been allocated 25 voting credits to spend on several proposals. The voter has varying degrees of interest in three proposals: Proposal A, Proposal B, and Proposal C.

  • Proposal A: High interest.
  • Proposal B: Moderate interest.
  • Proposal C: Low interest.

The voter might allocate their credits as follows:

Proposal A:

  • Votes cast: 3
  • Cost: 9 delegated tokens

Proposal B:

  • Votes cast: 2
  • Cost: 4 delegated tokens

Proposal C:

  • Votes cast: 1
  • Cost: 1 delegated token

Total delegated tokens: 14
Remaining tokens: 11

With the remaining tokens, the voter can choose to allocate additional votes to the proposals based on their preferences or save for future proposals. If they feel particularly strong about Proposal A, they might decide to cast one more vote:

Additional vote on Proposal A:

  • New total votes: 4
  • New cost: 16 delegated tokens
  • Additional cost: 16−9 = 7 delegated tokens

Updated total delegated tokens: 14+7 = 21

Updated remaining tokens: 25−21 = 425 - 21 = 4

This additional vote on Proposal A costs 7 credits, significantly more than the previous vote, illustrating how the quadratic cost discourages excessive influence on a single issue without strong conviction.

Benefits of Implementing Quadratic Voting

Key Characteristics of the Quadratic Cost Function

  • Marginal Cost Increases Linearly: The marginal cost of each additional vote increases linearly. The cost difference between casting n and n−1 votes is 2n−1.
  • Total Cost Increases Quadratically: The total cost to cast multiple votes rises steeply, discouraging voters from concentrating too many votes on a single issue without significant reason.
  • Promotes Egalitarian Voting: Small voters are encouraged to participate, because relatively they have a much higher impact.

Advantages Over Traditional Voting Systems

Quadratic Voting offers several benefits compared to traditional one-person-one-vote systems:

  • Captures Preference Intensity: By allowing voters to express how strongly they feel about an issue, QV leads to outcomes that better reflect the collective welfare.
  • Reduces Majority Domination: The quadratic cost makes it costly for majority groups to overpower minority interests on every issue.
  • Encourages Honest Voting: Voters are incentivized to allocate votes in proportion to their true preferences, reducing manipulation.

By understanding the foundation of Quadratic Voting, stakeholders in Web3 communities can appreciate how this system supports more representative governance.

Conclusion

Quadratic voting is a novel voting system that may be used within DAOs to foster decentralization. The key idea is to make the cost of voting on a certain issue increase quadratically. The leading player that makes use of this mechanism is Optimism. If you're pondering about the design of your DAO, we highly recommend taking a look at their research on quadratic funding.

If you're looking to create a robust governance model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure that your DAO will stand out as a beacon of innovation and resilience in the long term.