Company’s tokenization step by step. 8 tips to help you get funding through Blockchain

Iwo Hachulski

06 Jul 2020
Company’s tokenization step by step. 8 tips to help you get funding through Blockchain

Tokenization, by the most popular definition a form of transforming the value of business into digital resources, evokes more and more interest among entrepreneurs. Tokenization may be particularly important for entities that are considering alternative paths to VC or Business Angel to obtain financing for the development of their companies. The post-pandemic crisis and the new reality faced by business founders may encourage them to delve deeper into the subject, especially in the context of scarce funds of traditional investors. The company's tokenization often provides an easier and quicker opportunity to raise funds for further investments. Is this a solution worth considering? Where to start in order to tokenize your business? In this article we present 8 steps to implement the whole process together with specific examples of the tokenized projects.

Preliminary analysis

Make a preliminary analysis to assess your company's financial needs. Specify what you want to raise money for. Identify your target group, competition and market and decide if it is prospective enough. Describe your business or product and consult it with blockchain experts. Answering the question - to whom your issue should be directed - will also allow you to undertake the first analyses related to a later marketing campaign.

Choice of the type of issue and legal form

An important issue is the choice of the type of blockchain tokenization and legal form of the issue. A number of solutions are available, including ICO (initial coin offering), STO (security token offering) and ETO (equity token offering). ICO does not guarantee any ownership rights to the token buyer, and the issue and purchase of the offered tokens can be done almost entirely anonymously. STO and ETO, on the other hand, secure the purchaser through legal solutions, thereby transferring shares in the form of the purchased token. Thanks to the verification of both companies and investors they provide greater security for each party. They are in a way hybrid solutions - a combination of cryptic ICOs with more traditional investment fundraising.

Token economy

The next step is to identify the so-called token economy, which defines the type of emission. It consists of a number of elements:

Define a target, minimum and maximum amount to be collected within the issue. It is important to have an understanding of economic law. Choose the appropriate jurisdiction or law firm that will guide you through the process of establishing a company and a bank account in a given country, taking into account specific administrative requirements. The Nextrope team cooperates with law firms specialising in this area, so you do not have to waste time looking for top-notch lawyers specialising in tokenization.

Decide in which currencies customers can buy tokens. Will they be just cryptic currencies (specify which ones) or will they also be traditional currencies? The most common solutions are ETH, BTC, USDC and USDT. Depending on your preferences, the implementation will be more or less time-consuming.

Companies often lend tokenization on their infrastructure as part of IEO (initial exchange offering). This approach is unfortunately very limited and is not suitable for more legally complicated solutions. The main obstacles for companies considering IEO tokenization are primarily:

- Sharing revenue with another revenue broker.

- Loss of potential to build their own community.

- Problems with handling sensitive data.

Decide within which model the tokens you emit will be functioning. Options include the standard ERC20 or the new ERC1400 format. The first one guarantees that the tokens will not differ from each other in any way. The second one makes the tokens non-fungible. Each of them is unique and marked with a serial number.

Determine the benefits of purchasing your tokens to buyers and how large the token circulation will be on the market.

Start cooperating with a tax and financial advisor, who will develop the most optimal financial constructions for you. At Nextrope we cooperate with many advisors and we will be happy to connect you with them.

KYC/AML

Take care of KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) processes. These are two key elements in the entire tokenization process. The first one is a legal procedure, obliging legal entities (in this case you) to identify their customers and obtain true and accurate information required to receive funds interested in your business. The second one means taking action to verify the origin of the funds received. It is important that the investor platform you plan to use is integrated with KYC and AML service providers. This is the case with solutions offered by Nextrope.

Your needs and expectations

Discuss with your team of specialists what range of services you need. At Nextrope, you can expect not only technological support, but also consultations and preparation of the strategy of the tokenization process. Your platform will be fully personalized for your needs and requirements in relation to the tokenization itself. You will receive a fully customized landing page and an extensive, personalized administrator panel. You will have access to all the statistics, data and KYC verification at your fingertips, in the most intuitive place.

Project's White Paper

Create a fully comprehensive White Paper of your project, based on the advice of the experts' team. Remember to describe the developed token economics in detail. If several dozen pages of the document is a challenge for you, the Nextrope business team is ready to take part in the process of writing the White Paper and help you describe all the most important features of the project.

Marketing Campaign

Once the technical part is ready, develop and start a marketing campaign. Take care of a responsible approach to marketing. Pay attention to the appropriate commission system designed for your customers. Create a loyalty system, withdrawing bonuses to users on the amount paid. Build, motivate and manage your community. Make sure that information about your issue is available on all ICO/STO/ETO listing sites. Participate in industry conferences and focus on publishing your own content and producing industry reports. Showcase the human side of the blockchain-based business by organizing live and video conferences in social media and collaborating with industry influencers.

Further development

Usually, after the issue of your tokens is completed, the monitoring by the team providing technological solutions will end. Do not let this happen to you. Take care of the further development and long term development of your product as well as contact with the community - to continue to expand your business capabilities and resources. Good luck!

Nextrope.com is a software house focused on FinTech solutions market. Our team has already conducted over 10 tokenization processes, both in Poland and abroad. We are happy to help your company with tokenization using blockchain technology. Click here and tell us more about your project.

Nextrope Insights is a weekly newsletter on Fintech. You’ll receive market analysis on Blockchain, AI, Crypto, and other Fintech sectors every week! Our newsletter is subscribed by VC investors, startup founders, and industry experts. Yet you’re more than welcome even if you just started learning more about Fintech. You can join it here.

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Kajetan Olas

22 Nov 2024
Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Authors of the contents are not affiliated to the reviewed project in any way and none of the information presented should be taken as financial advice.

In this article we analyze tokenomics of Aethir - a project providing on-demand cloud compute resources for the AI, Gaming, and virtualized compute sectors.
Aethir aims to aggregate enterprise-grade GPUs from multiple providers into a DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network). Its competitive edge comes from utlizing the GPUs for very specific use-cases, such as low-latency rendering for online games.
Due to decentralized nature of its infrastructure Aethir can meet the demands of online-gaming in any region. This is especially important for some gamer-abundant regions in Asia with underdeveloped cloud infrastructure that causes high latency ("lags").
We will analyze Aethir's tokenomics, give our opinion on what was done well, and provide specific recommendations on how to improve it.

Evaluation Summary

Aethir Tokenomics Structure

The total supply of ATH tokens is capped at 42 billion ATH. This fixed cap provides a predictable supply environment, and the complete emissions schedule is listed here. As of November 2024 there are approximately 5.2 Billion ATH in circulation. In a year from now (November 2025), the circulating supply will almost triple, and will amount to approximately 15 Billion ATH. By November 2028, today's circulating supply will be diluted by around 86%.

From an investor standpoint the rational decision would be to stake their tokens and hope for rewards that will balance the inflation. Currently the estimated APR for 3-year staking is 195% and for 4-year staking APR is 261%. The rewards are paid out weekly. Furthermore, stakers can expect to get additional rewards from partnered AI projects.

Staking Incentives

Rewards are calculated based on the staking duration and staked amount. These factors are equally important and they linearly influence weekly rewards. This means that someone who stakes 100 ATH for 2 weeks will have the same weekly rewards as someone who stakes 200 ATH for 1 week. This mechanism greatly emphasizes long-term holding. That's because holding a token makes sense only if you go for long-term staking. E.g. a whale staking $200k with 1 week lockup. will have the same weekly rewards as person staking $1k with 4 year lockup. Furthermore the ATH staking rewards are fixed and divided among stakers. Therefore Increase of user base is likely to come with decrease in rewards.
We believe the main weak-point of Aethirs staking is the lack of equivalency between rewards paid out to the users and value generated for the protocol as a result of staking.

Token Distribution

The token distribution of $ATH is well designed and comes with long vesting time-frames. 18-month cliff and 36-moths subsequent linear vesting is applied to team's allocation. This is higher than industry standard and is a sign of long-term commitment.

  • Checkers and Compute Providers: 50%
  • Ecosystem: 15%
  • Team: 12.5%
  • Investors: 11.5%
  • Airdrop: 6%
  • Advisors: 5%

Aethir's airdrop is divided into 3 phases to ensure that only loyal users get rewarded. This mechanism is very-well thought and we rate it highly. It fosters high community engagement within the first months of the project and sets the ground for potentially giving more-control to the DAO.

Governance and Community-Led Development

Aethir’s governance model promotes community-led decision-making in a very practical way. Instead of rushing with creation of a DAO for PR and marketing purposes Aethir is trying to make it the right way. They support projects building on their infrastructure and regularly share updates with their community in the most professional manner.

We believe Aethir would benefit from implementing reputation boosted voting. An example of such system is described here. The core assumption is to abandon the simplistic: 1 token = 1 vote and go towards: Votes = tokens * reputation_based_multiplication_factor.

In the attached example, reputation_based_multiplication_factor rises exponentially with the number of standard deviations above norm, with regard to user's rating. For compute compute providers at Aethir, user's rating could be replaced by provider's uptime.

Perspectives for the future

While it's important to analyze aspects such as supply-side tokenomics, or governance, we must keep in mind that 95% of project's success depends on demand-side. In this regard the outlook for Aethir may be very bright. The project declares $36M annual reccuring revenue. Revenue like this is very rare in the web3 space. Many projects are not able to generate any revenue after succesfull ICO event, due to lack fo product-market-fit.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

Quadratic Voting in Web3

Kajetan Olas

04 Dec 2024
Quadratic Voting in Web3

Decentralized systems are reshaping how we interact, conduct transactions, and govern online communities. As Web3 continues to advance, the necessity for effective and fair voting mechanisms becomes apparent. Traditional voting systems, such as the one-token-one-vote model, often fall short in capturing the intensity of individual preferences, which can result in centralization. Quadratic Voting (QV) addresses this challenge by enabling individuals to express not only their choices but also the strength of their preferences.

In QV, voters are allocated a budget of credits that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The cost of casting multiple votes on a single issue increases quadratically, meaning that each additional vote costs more than the last. This system allows for a more precise expression of preferences, as individuals can invest more heavily in issues they care deeply about while conserving credits on matters of lesser importance.

Understanding Quadratic Voting

Quadratic Voting (QV) is a voting system designed to capture not only the choices of individuals but also the strength of their preferences. In most DAO voting mechanisms, each person typically has one vote per token, which limits the ability to express how strongly they feel about a particular matter. Furthermore, QV limits the power of whales and founding team who typically have large token allocations. These problems are adressed by making the cost of each additional vote increase quadratically.

In QV, each voter is given a budget of credits or tokens that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The key principle is that the cost to cast n votes on a single issue is proportional to the square of n. This quadratic cost function ensures that while voters can express stronger preferences, doing so requires a disproportionately higher expenditure of their voting credits. This mechanism discourages voters from concentrating all their influence on a single issue unless they feel very strongly about it. In the context of DAOs, it means that large holders will have a hard-time pushing through with a proposal if they'll try to do it on their own.

Practical Example

Consider a voter who has been allocated 25 voting credits to spend on several proposals. The voter has varying degrees of interest in three proposals: Proposal A, Proposal B, and Proposal C.

  • Proposal A: High interest.
  • Proposal B: Moderate interest.
  • Proposal C: Low interest.

The voter might allocate their credits as follows:

Proposal A:

  • Votes cast: 3
  • Cost: 9 delegated tokens

Proposal B:

  • Votes cast: 2
  • Cost: 4 delegated tokens

Proposal C:

  • Votes cast: 1
  • Cost: 1 delegated token

Total delegated tokens: 14
Remaining tokens: 11

With the remaining tokens, the voter can choose to allocate additional votes to the proposals based on their preferences or save for future proposals. If they feel particularly strong about Proposal A, they might decide to cast one more vote:

Additional vote on Proposal A:

  • New total votes: 4
  • New cost: 16 delegated tokens
  • Additional cost: 16−9 = 7 delegated tokens

Updated total delegated tokens: 14+7 = 21

Updated remaining tokens: 25−21 = 425 - 21 = 4

This additional vote on Proposal A costs 7 credits, significantly more than the previous vote, illustrating how the quadratic cost discourages excessive influence on a single issue without strong conviction.

Benefits of Implementing Quadratic Voting

Key Characteristics of the Quadratic Cost Function

  • Marginal Cost Increases Linearly: The marginal cost of each additional vote increases linearly. The cost difference between casting n and n−1 votes is 2n−1.
  • Total Cost Increases Quadratically: The total cost to cast multiple votes rises steeply, discouraging voters from concentrating too many votes on a single issue without significant reason.
  • Promotes Egalitarian Voting: Small voters are encouraged to participate, because relatively they have a much higher impact.

Advantages Over Traditional Voting Systems

Quadratic Voting offers several benefits compared to traditional one-person-one-vote systems:

  • Captures Preference Intensity: By allowing voters to express how strongly they feel about an issue, QV leads to outcomes that better reflect the collective welfare.
  • Reduces Majority Domination: The quadratic cost makes it costly for majority groups to overpower minority interests on every issue.
  • Encourages Honest Voting: Voters are incentivized to allocate votes in proportion to their true preferences, reducing manipulation.

By understanding the foundation of Quadratic Voting, stakeholders in Web3 communities can appreciate how this system supports more representative governance.

Conclusion

Quadratic voting is a novel voting system that may be used within DAOs to foster decentralization. The key idea is to make the cost of voting on a certain issue increase quadratically. The leading player that makes use of this mechanism is Optimism. If you're pondering about the design of your DAO, we highly recommend taking a look at their research on quadratic funding.

If you're looking to create a robust governance model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure that your DAO will stand out as a beacon of innovation and resilience in the long term.