Crypto Regulations are coming…

a.shah

19 Oct 2020
Crypto Regulations are coming…

Understanding crypto regulation is an integral step in learning about the blockchain industry. On our Nextrope blog, we decode the existing ecosystem of regulation, recent regulatory changes and barriers against new regulation.

The Status-Quo of Crypto Regulation

Cryptocurrency’s decentralized nature has prevented governments from exercising universal control and regulations. This barrier prompted varying approaches to crypto regulation across countries.

Source: Visual Capitalist

1) Extremely Tight Regulation

Countries such as Algeria, Bolivia, Morocco, Nepal, Pakistan, and Vietnam have completely prohibited cryptocurrency. 

2) Tight Regulation

Qatar and Bahrain permit cryptocurrency-related activities strictly outside the borders. 

3) Slightly Tight Regulation

Instead of directly outlawing crypto-related activities, Bangladesh, Iran, Thailand, Lithuania, Lesotho, China, and Colombia have barred their financial institutions from executing crypto-related transactions.

4) Medium Regulation 

Australia, Canada, and the Isle of Man have amended their counterterrorism and money laundering laws to regulate cryptocurrency markets and mandate  due diligence requirements on their financial institutions.

5) Slightly Weak Regulation

Spain, Belarus, the Cayman Islands, and Luxembourg are establishing crypto-friendly regulations with the goal of attracting tech investments. 

6) Weak Regulation

Belgium, South Africa, and the United Kingdom have determined the current cryptocurrency market to be inconsequentially small and are yet to establish any regulations. 

7) Extremely Weak Regulation

France, Marshall Islands, Venezuela, the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (ECCB) member states and Lithuania are in efforts of establishing their own cryptocurrency systems. 

Why is Regulation Necessary?

Wei Zhou, the chief financial officer of the cryptocurrency exchange, Binance, spoke out in support of the cryptoregulation. Experts such as Zhou recognize that the human elements of cryptocurrency makes the system vulnerable to fraud, money laundering, terrorism and organized crime. 

Despite some users’ concerns regarding the potential negative effects of crypto regulations on its trading values and innovation, major crypto regulations have empirically never posed a long-term impact on the share price of Bitcoin, save for some immediate volatility. Further, crypto users widely believe that regulations provide the much needed investor protections that offsets its potential drawbacks. 

Source: Finance Magnates

Recent Regulatory Actions 

European Union (EU) – Proposal for a Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCa)

On September 24, 2020, the EU Commission enacted the regulations on Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCa). MiCa’s goals are (1) reducing the rate of cash payment, which currently make up 78% of all payments in the eurozone, and (2) stimulating responsible innovation and competition among financial services providers in the EU. 

MiCA plans to differentiate between crypto-assets governed by EU legislation from crypto-assets that fall outside its scope. Prof. Rasa Karpandza, a professor of Economics and Finance at New York University Abu Dhabi and EBS Business School, claimed that “In order to achieve widespread usage as an alternative to fiat options, blockchain and crypto assets need to be classified appropriately and this is a good first step”.

In order to harmonize the EU market and prevent market regulatory fragmentation, the EU Commission published a single set of immediately applicable rules for the EU's Single Market as opposed to a "Directive", which leaves Member State discretion through the need of national transposition. I believe that MiCA will effectively bring together the fragmented national crypto-asset legal regimes within the EU.

United States (US) – Stablecoin guidance

On September 21, 2020,the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published stablecoin guidance, laying out the legal implications of  cryptocurrencies backed by fiat currencies for the first time. Stablecoin (cryptocurrencies designed to minimize volatility of price and usually backed by fiat money) issuers have been using U.S. banks for years but in an unclear regulatory environment. Through the new guidance, the SEC plans to better ensure safety for the federally regulated banks as they provide services to stablecoin issuers.

Venezuela – Decentralized Exchange

On October 2,2020, the National Superintendency of Securities of Venezuela (Sunaval) authorized the operation of a decentralized electronic exchange. This legalized the exchange of shares, fiat money, securities, debt securities and cryptocurrencies. Sunaval plans to decrease the commissions to nearly 0% in order to encourage its use.

Israel – Treatment of cryptocurrency as Fiat

On September 22, 2020, the Israeli legislature proposed the amendment of existing tax law. While the current income tax policy taxes digital currencies 25% anytime it is converted into fiat, the new legislation seeks to (1) have digital currencies be treated like fiat for tax purposes and (2) exempt gain taxes on digital currencies.

Malaysia – Approval of Cryptocurrency exchange

On January 15, 2019, Malaysia passed “The Capital Markets and Services (Prescription of Securities) (Digital Currency and Digital Token) Order 2019”. Designed to regulate DAX operators, the Order was followed by the legalization of a cryptocurrency exchange agency’s operation. 

Nigeria – Beginning of regulatory conversation

Source: Google Trends, Regions with highest bitcoin searches

Bitcoin has become increasingly popular in Nigeria (highest google searches in the World) and the Nigerian SEC is working to recognize cryptocurrencies as financial securities and establishing safety regulations. The Nigerian SEC claimed that “the general objective of regulation is not to hinder technology or stifle innovation, but to create standards that encourage ethical practices”,  advocating that this will protect investors’ interests and promote transparency. 

South Korea – Permit System for Crypto Exchanges

On March 5, 2020, South Korea’s National Assembly passed a revised bill on the reporting and the use of special financial transaction information. The bill introduces a permit system for cryptocurrency exchanges as well as the plans to strengthen the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) system for virtual assets including cryptocurrency.

China – Digital Yuan

China has been working vigorously on the digital yuan, though cryptocurrency is formally banned in the country. Digital yuan targets the dominance of tech giants, such as Alibaba and Tencent, in the digital payments sector. However, the government remains cautious in its approach to both its own cryptocurrency and digital assets and is yet to issue regulations.

Barriers against Regulations?

1) Economic Strategy

Because some governments believe that crypto regulation will impede growth and innovation, they intentionally avoid implementing regulations as an economic strategy. These governments also believe that while high barriers to entry through stricter regulation can benefit users by providing security, it may also curtail potential projects through financial and regulatory strains.

2) Incomplete Understanding of Cryptomarket

Current understanding of cryptocurrency, of users, economists and policymakers, remains incomplete, partly due to the volatility of the crypto market and its small size. Thus, governments are hesitant to implement hasty regulations.

3) Threat to National Economic Sovereignty

Countries, specifically the developing nations, believe that cryptocurrency will be harmful to their economic sovereignty. Decentralized finance has the potential to disrupt the financial services sector. 

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Kajetan Olas

22 Nov 2024
Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Authors of the contents are not affiliated to the reviewed project in any way and none of the information presented should be taken as financial advice.

In this article we analyze tokenomics of Aethir - a project providing on-demand cloud compute resources for the AI, Gaming, and virtualized compute sectors.
Aethir aims to aggregate enterprise-grade GPUs from multiple providers into a DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network). Its competitive edge comes from utlizing the GPUs for very specific use-cases, such as low-latency rendering for online games.
Due to decentralized nature of its infrastructure Aethir can meet the demands of online-gaming in any region. This is especially important for some gamer-abundant regions in Asia with underdeveloped cloud infrastructure that causes high latency ("lags").
We will analyze Aethir's tokenomics, give our opinion on what was done well, and provide specific recommendations on how to improve it.

Evaluation Summary

Aethir Tokenomics Structure

The total supply of ATH tokens is capped at 42 billion ATH. This fixed cap provides a predictable supply environment, and the complete emissions schedule is listed here. As of November 2024 there are approximately 5.2 Billion ATH in circulation. In a year from now (November 2025), the circulating supply will almost triple, and will amount to approximately 15 Billion ATH. By November 2028, today's circulating supply will be diluted by around 86%.

From an investor standpoint the rational decision would be to stake their tokens and hope for rewards that will balance the inflation. Currently the estimated APR for 3-year staking is 195% and for 4-year staking APR is 261%. The rewards are paid out weekly. Furthermore, stakers can expect to get additional rewards from partnered AI projects.

Staking Incentives

Rewards are calculated based on the staking duration and staked amount. These factors are equally important and they linearly influence weekly rewards. This means that someone who stakes 100 ATH for 2 weeks will have the same weekly rewards as someone who stakes 200 ATH for 1 week. This mechanism greatly emphasizes long-term holding. That's because holding a token makes sense only if you go for long-term staking. E.g. a whale staking $200k with 1 week lockup. will have the same weekly rewards as person staking $1k with 4 year lockup. Furthermore the ATH staking rewards are fixed and divided among stakers. Therefore Increase of user base is likely to come with decrease in rewards.
We believe the main weak-point of Aethirs staking is the lack of equivalency between rewards paid out to the users and value generated for the protocol as a result of staking.

Token Distribution

The token distribution of $ATH is well designed and comes with long vesting time-frames. 18-month cliff and 36-moths subsequent linear vesting is applied to team's allocation. This is higher than industry standard and is a sign of long-term commitment.

  • Checkers and Compute Providers: 50%
  • Ecosystem: 15%
  • Team: 12.5%
  • Investors: 11.5%
  • Airdrop: 6%
  • Advisors: 5%

Aethir's airdrop is divided into 3 phases to ensure that only loyal users get rewarded. This mechanism is very-well thought and we rate it highly. It fosters high community engagement within the first months of the project and sets the ground for potentially giving more-control to the DAO.

Governance and Community-Led Development

Aethir’s governance model promotes community-led decision-making in a very practical way. Instead of rushing with creation of a DAO for PR and marketing purposes Aethir is trying to make it the right way. They support projects building on their infrastructure and regularly share updates with their community in the most professional manner.

We believe Aethir would benefit from implementing reputation boosted voting. An example of such system is described here. The core assumption is to abandon the simplistic: 1 token = 1 vote and go towards: Votes = tokens * reputation_based_multiplication_factor.

In the attached example, reputation_based_multiplication_factor rises exponentially with the number of standard deviations above norm, with regard to user's rating. For compute compute providers at Aethir, user's rating could be replaced by provider's uptime.

Perspectives for the future

While it's important to analyze aspects such as supply-side tokenomics, or governance, we must keep in mind that 95% of project's success depends on demand-side. In this regard the outlook for Aethir may be very bright. The project declares $36M annual reccuring revenue. Revenue like this is very rare in the web3 space. Many projects are not able to generate any revenue after succesfull ICO event, due to lack fo product-market-fit.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

Quadratic Voting in Web3

Kajetan Olas

04 Dec 2024
Quadratic Voting in Web3

Decentralized systems are reshaping how we interact, conduct transactions, and govern online communities. As Web3 continues to advance, the necessity for effective and fair voting mechanisms becomes apparent. Traditional voting systems, such as the one-token-one-vote model, often fall short in capturing the intensity of individual preferences, which can result in centralization. Quadratic Voting (QV) addresses this challenge by enabling individuals to express not only their choices but also the strength of their preferences.

In QV, voters are allocated a budget of credits that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The cost of casting multiple votes on a single issue increases quadratically, meaning that each additional vote costs more than the last. This system allows for a more precise expression of preferences, as individuals can invest more heavily in issues they care deeply about while conserving credits on matters of lesser importance.

Understanding Quadratic Voting

Quadratic Voting (QV) is a voting system designed to capture not only the choices of individuals but also the strength of their preferences. In most DAO voting mechanisms, each person typically has one vote per token, which limits the ability to express how strongly they feel about a particular matter. Furthermore, QV limits the power of whales and founding team who typically have large token allocations. These problems are adressed by making the cost of each additional vote increase quadratically.

In QV, each voter is given a budget of credits or tokens that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The key principle is that the cost to cast n votes on a single issue is proportional to the square of n. This quadratic cost function ensures that while voters can express stronger preferences, doing so requires a disproportionately higher expenditure of their voting credits. This mechanism discourages voters from concentrating all their influence on a single issue unless they feel very strongly about it. In the context of DAOs, it means that large holders will have a hard-time pushing through with a proposal if they'll try to do it on their own.

Practical Example

Consider a voter who has been allocated 25 voting credits to spend on several proposals. The voter has varying degrees of interest in three proposals: Proposal A, Proposal B, and Proposal C.

  • Proposal A: High interest.
  • Proposal B: Moderate interest.
  • Proposal C: Low interest.

The voter might allocate their credits as follows:

Proposal A:

  • Votes cast: 3
  • Cost: 9 delegated tokens

Proposal B:

  • Votes cast: 2
  • Cost: 4 delegated tokens

Proposal C:

  • Votes cast: 1
  • Cost: 1 delegated token

Total delegated tokens: 14
Remaining tokens: 11

With the remaining tokens, the voter can choose to allocate additional votes to the proposals based on their preferences or save for future proposals. If they feel particularly strong about Proposal A, they might decide to cast one more vote:

Additional vote on Proposal A:

  • New total votes: 4
  • New cost: 16 delegated tokens
  • Additional cost: 16−9 = 7 delegated tokens

Updated total delegated tokens: 14+7 = 21

Updated remaining tokens: 25−21 = 425 - 21 = 4

This additional vote on Proposal A costs 7 credits, significantly more than the previous vote, illustrating how the quadratic cost discourages excessive influence on a single issue without strong conviction.

Benefits of Implementing Quadratic Voting

Key Characteristics of the Quadratic Cost Function

  • Marginal Cost Increases Linearly: The marginal cost of each additional vote increases linearly. The cost difference between casting n and n−1 votes is 2n−1.
  • Total Cost Increases Quadratically: The total cost to cast multiple votes rises steeply, discouraging voters from concentrating too many votes on a single issue without significant reason.
  • Promotes Egalitarian Voting: Small voters are encouraged to participate, because relatively they have a much higher impact.

Advantages Over Traditional Voting Systems

Quadratic Voting offers several benefits compared to traditional one-person-one-vote systems:

  • Captures Preference Intensity: By allowing voters to express how strongly they feel about an issue, QV leads to outcomes that better reflect the collective welfare.
  • Reduces Majority Domination: The quadratic cost makes it costly for majority groups to overpower minority interests on every issue.
  • Encourages Honest Voting: Voters are incentivized to allocate votes in proportion to their true preferences, reducing manipulation.

By understanding the foundation of Quadratic Voting, stakeholders in Web3 communities can appreciate how this system supports more representative governance.

Conclusion

Quadratic voting is a novel voting system that may be used within DAOs to foster decentralization. The key idea is to make the cost of voting on a certain issue increase quadratically. The leading player that makes use of this mechanism is Optimism. If you're pondering about the design of your DAO, we highly recommend taking a look at their research on quadratic funding.

If you're looking to create a robust governance model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure that your DAO will stand out as a beacon of innovation and resilience in the long term.