Arbitrum Hacks in 2023

Karolina

06 Oct 2023
Arbitrum Hacks in 2023

The innovations brought about by decentralized platforms promise a new era of finance and applications. Yet, as with any emergent technology, vulnerabilities and risks are unearthed, especially in the early stages. 2023 has borne witness to a series of security breaches, particularly on the Arbitrum network. This article dives deep into these breaches, shedding light on the incidents and understanding their implications, it shows some hacks on the Arbitrum network.

What is Arbitrum?

Arbitrum, an exciting and innovative off-chain scaling solution, has captured significant attention in the crypto world. Designed to optimize Ethereum, it stands out due to its ability to reduce transaction costs while simultaneously increasing the speed of transaction processing. At its core, Arbitrum utilizes "rollups," which bundle or "roll" multiple transactions into a single one, thereby offering a more efficient way to process high volumes of transactions.

The rise of decentralized applications (dApps) and DeFi platforms requires scalable solutions, and Arbitrum offers precisely that. Its mechanism allows developers to create smart contracts in a secure environment without compromising on the decentralized principles that underpin the Ethereum network. This breakthrough has led to a growing number of projects choosing Arbitrum as their preferred network.

However, with greater adoption comes greater scrutiny, and the network has faced its fair share of challenges in 2023. As we delve deeper into this year's Arbitrum hacks, it's essential to understand the foundational role the network plays in the larger blockchain ecosystem and why its security is of utmost importance.

A Turbulent Year for Arbitrum Security - Arbitrum Hacks

Security challenges have never been more pertinent than in 2023 with the Arbitrum network finding itself embroiled in a series of significant hacks. These security breaches have not only resulted in substantial financial losses but have also raised questions about the security standards of protocols built on this layer.

The Rodeo Finance Exploit - Jul 11, 2023

Rodeo Finance, a DeFi protocol on the Arbitrum Network, suffered a loss of 472 Ether, amounting to approximately $888,000.

The security breach was made public by blockchain security company PeckShield, which traced the path of the stolen funds. It was found that the hacker had transferred the looted Ether from Arbitrum to Ethereum.

By leveraging the Oracle manipulation technique, the hacker could alter price feeds, thereby exploiting the platform for nearly a million dollars worth of crypto.

This technique involved feeding incorrect data from off-chain resources into smart contracts. By manipulating this data, hackers could mislead the smart contract into undesired actions, in this case, transferring a substantial amount of Ether.

The aftermath saw the hacker cleverly masking their activities. They exchanged the stolen assets for various tokens, eventually converting them back to Ether. This Ether was then routed through Tornado Cash, a cryptocurrency mixer, further obfuscating the fund's origins.

In the immediate aftermath, Rodeo Finance's token value plummeted, registering a 65% decline in just an hour.

Read More About This Hack HERE

The Jimbos Protocol Hack - May 28, 2023

Jimbos, a recently launched decentralized crypto protocol on Arbitrum, encountered a security breach that led to the theft of 4,090 Ether, approximately valued at $7.7 million.

The hacker exploited a "slippage" issue, a term referring to the variance between a trade's expected price and the actual execution price. While slippage typically results from large trades or liquidity mismatches, in Jimbos' case, it was an absence of control measures against excessive slippage that was the culprit.

The hacker managed to manipulate the protocol's liquidity at distorted prices, eventually extracting 4,090 Ether through a reverse swap mechanism.

As a result, the native token of Jimbos, JIMBO, suffered a severe hit, losing around 40% of its value overnight.

Read More About This Hack HERE

Sentiment's Million Dollar Heist - April 5, 2023

Sentiment, another DeFi protocol on Arbitrum, lost almost $1 million to hackers. In a bid to retrieve the stolen funds, the protocol's developers announced a 10% recovery bounty, offering $95,000 to anyone aiding in the funds' return.

The hack was attributed to a "read-only reentrancy" bug, previously identified by smart contract auditor ChainSecurity. This type of vulnerability allows hackers to continuously drain funds by repeatedly invoking a smart contract's withdrawal function.

It was later unveiled that the attacker leveraged this bug to manipulate an integration between Sentiment and the decentralized exchange Balancer, thereby tricking the protocol into releasing almost $1 million in various assets, including USDC, USDT, Bitcoin, and Ether.

Read More About This Hack HERE

The Massive Phishing Scheme and Airdrop Theft - March 31 & 25, 2023

On March 31, over a million Arbitrum tokens (ARB) were pilfered. Two wallets were primarily involved in this theft, converting a substantial number of ARB tokens to Ethereum. The connection between these wallets, if any, remains uncertain.

Close on the heels of this incident, on March 25, hackers made away with $500,000 worth of tokens intended for Arbitrum's airdrop. They achieved this by exploiting vanity addresses, which are personalized crypto addresses.

By generating similar vanity addresses, the attackers redirected the airdropped tokens to their own wallets, rendering the original owners powerless.

Although vanity addresses can provide a unique personal touch to one's crypto holdings, they pose considerable security risks, particularly when generated through potentially insecure platforms.

In the context of these breaches, it's also noteworthy that according to a report from the bug bounty platform Immunefi, there's been a 63% surge in hacks across various blockchains in the second quarter of 2023 compared to the previous year. With DeFi platforms incurring losses of $228 million in just this quarter, the Arbitrum breaches are a small, yet significant fraction of a much larger problem plaguing the crypto world.

Read More About This Hacks HERE and HERE

Lessons and Moving Forward

Security breaches, while detrimental, offer invaluable lessons for both developers and users in the decentralized landscape. The series of hacks on the Arbitrum network in 2023 reiterates the need for vigilance and proactive measures. Here's what can be gleaned from the unfortunate events:

  • Robust Smart Contract Audits. While many projects undergo smart contract audits, the presence of exploitable bugs like the "read-only reentrancy" in Sentiment suggests the need for more comprehensive and rigorous checks.
  • Advanced Oracle Security. The Rodeo Finance incident underlines the importance of securing oracles against manipulations. Developers need to explore advanced mechanisms to ensure the authenticity of data fed into smart contracts.
  • User Education and Vigilance. The vanity address exploit during the Arbitrum airdrop highlights that users themselves can sometimes be vulnerabilities. Educational initiatives can help users avoid pitfalls and adopt best practices.
  • Adaptive Security Measures. The crypto landscape evolves at a breakneck pace. Protocols need to implement adaptive security mechanisms that can adjust to new threats and vulnerabilities as they emerge.
  • Community Collaboration. Open-source collaboration and global community feedback can help in identifying potential threats and vulnerabilities before they are exploited.

Conclusion

The Arbitrum hacks of 2023 stand as a stark reminder of the challenges and vulnerabilities inherent in the world of decentralized finance and applications.

However, every challenge presents an opportunity. The crypto community's resilience is evident in its ability to rally together, learn from these setbacks, and continuously work towards creating a more secure and trustworthy ecosystem. As we look forward, it's essential to strike a balance between rapid innovation and the safety of protocols and users.

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Kajetan Olas

22 Nov 2024
Aethir Tokenomics – Case Study

Authors of the contents are not affiliated to the reviewed project in any way and none of the information presented should be taken as financial advice.

In this article we analyze tokenomics of Aethir - a project providing on-demand cloud compute resources for the AI, Gaming, and virtualized compute sectors.
Aethir aims to aggregate enterprise-grade GPUs from multiple providers into a DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network). Its competitive edge comes from utlizing the GPUs for very specific use-cases, such as low-latency rendering for online games.
Due to decentralized nature of its infrastructure Aethir can meet the demands of online-gaming in any region. This is especially important for some gamer-abundant regions in Asia with underdeveloped cloud infrastructure that causes high latency ("lags").
We will analyze Aethir's tokenomics, give our opinion on what was done well, and provide specific recommendations on how to improve it.

Evaluation Summary

Aethir Tokenomics Structure

The total supply of ATH tokens is capped at 42 billion ATH. This fixed cap provides a predictable supply environment, and the complete emissions schedule is listed here. As of November 2024 there are approximately 5.2 Billion ATH in circulation. In a year from now (November 2025), the circulating supply will almost triple, and will amount to approximately 15 Billion ATH. By November 2028, today's circulating supply will be diluted by around 86%.

From an investor standpoint the rational decision would be to stake their tokens and hope for rewards that will balance the inflation. Currently the estimated APR for 3-year staking is 195% and for 4-year staking APR is 261%. The rewards are paid out weekly. Furthermore, stakers can expect to get additional rewards from partnered AI projects.

Staking Incentives

Rewards are calculated based on the staking duration and staked amount. These factors are equally important and they linearly influence weekly rewards. This means that someone who stakes 100 ATH for 2 weeks will have the same weekly rewards as someone who stakes 200 ATH for 1 week. This mechanism greatly emphasizes long-term holding. That's because holding a token makes sense only if you go for long-term staking. E.g. a whale staking $200k with 1 week lockup. will have the same weekly rewards as person staking $1k with 4 year lockup. Furthermore the ATH staking rewards are fixed and divided among stakers. Therefore Increase of user base is likely to come with decrease in rewards.
We believe the main weak-point of Aethirs staking is the lack of equivalency between rewards paid out to the users and value generated for the protocol as a result of staking.

Token Distribution

The token distribution of $ATH is well designed and comes with long vesting time-frames. 18-month cliff and 36-moths subsequent linear vesting is applied to team's allocation. This is higher than industry standard and is a sign of long-term commitment.

  • Checkers and Compute Providers: 50%
  • Ecosystem: 15%
  • Team: 12.5%
  • Investors: 11.5%
  • Airdrop: 6%
  • Advisors: 5%

Aethir's airdrop is divided into 3 phases to ensure that only loyal users get rewarded. This mechanism is very-well thought and we rate it highly. It fosters high community engagement within the first months of the project and sets the ground for potentially giving more-control to the DAO.

Governance and Community-Led Development

Aethir’s governance model promotes community-led decision-making in a very practical way. Instead of rushing with creation of a DAO for PR and marketing purposes Aethir is trying to make it the right way. They support projects building on their infrastructure and regularly share updates with their community in the most professional manner.

We believe Aethir would benefit from implementing reputation boosted voting. An example of such system is described here. The core assumption is to abandon the simplistic: 1 token = 1 vote and go towards: Votes = tokens * reputation_based_multiplication_factor.

In the attached example, reputation_based_multiplication_factor rises exponentially with the number of standard deviations above norm, with regard to user's rating. For compute compute providers at Aethir, user's rating could be replaced by provider's uptime.

Perspectives for the future

While it's important to analyze aspects such as supply-side tokenomics, or governance, we must keep in mind that 95% of project's success depends on demand-side. In this regard the outlook for Aethir may be very bright. The project declares $36M annual reccuring revenue. Revenue like this is very rare in the web3 space. Many projects are not able to generate any revenue after succesfull ICO event, due to lack fo product-market-fit.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

Quadratic Voting in Web3

Kajetan Olas

04 Dec 2024
Quadratic Voting in Web3

Decentralized systems are reshaping how we interact, conduct transactions, and govern online communities. As Web3 continues to advance, the necessity for effective and fair voting mechanisms becomes apparent. Traditional voting systems, such as the one-token-one-vote model, often fall short in capturing the intensity of individual preferences, which can result in centralization. Quadratic Voting (QV) addresses this challenge by enabling individuals to express not only their choices but also the strength of their preferences.

In QV, voters are allocated a budget of credits that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The cost of casting multiple votes on a single issue increases quadratically, meaning that each additional vote costs more than the last. This system allows for a more precise expression of preferences, as individuals can invest more heavily in issues they care deeply about while conserving credits on matters of lesser importance.

Understanding Quadratic Voting

Quadratic Voting (QV) is a voting system designed to capture not only the choices of individuals but also the strength of their preferences. In most DAO voting mechanisms, each person typically has one vote per token, which limits the ability to express how strongly they feel about a particular matter. Furthermore, QV limits the power of whales and founding team who typically have large token allocations. These problems are adressed by making the cost of each additional vote increase quadratically.

In QV, each voter is given a budget of credits or tokens that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The key principle is that the cost to cast n votes on a single issue is proportional to the square of n. This quadratic cost function ensures that while voters can express stronger preferences, doing so requires a disproportionately higher expenditure of their voting credits. This mechanism discourages voters from concentrating all their influence on a single issue unless they feel very strongly about it. In the context of DAOs, it means that large holders will have a hard-time pushing through with a proposal if they'll try to do it on their own.

Practical Example

Consider a voter who has been allocated 25 voting credits to spend on several proposals. The voter has varying degrees of interest in three proposals: Proposal A, Proposal B, and Proposal C.

  • Proposal A: High interest.
  • Proposal B: Moderate interest.
  • Proposal C: Low interest.

The voter might allocate their credits as follows:

Proposal A:

  • Votes cast: 3
  • Cost: 9 delegated tokens

Proposal B:

  • Votes cast: 2
  • Cost: 4 delegated tokens

Proposal C:

  • Votes cast: 1
  • Cost: 1 delegated token

Total delegated tokens: 14
Remaining tokens: 11

With the remaining tokens, the voter can choose to allocate additional votes to the proposals based on their preferences or save for future proposals. If they feel particularly strong about Proposal A, they might decide to cast one more vote:

Additional vote on Proposal A:

  • New total votes: 4
  • New cost: 16 delegated tokens
  • Additional cost: 16−9 = 7 delegated tokens

Updated total delegated tokens: 14+7 = 21

Updated remaining tokens: 25−21 = 425 - 21 = 4

This additional vote on Proposal A costs 7 credits, significantly more than the previous vote, illustrating how the quadratic cost discourages excessive influence on a single issue without strong conviction.

Benefits of Implementing Quadratic Voting

Key Characteristics of the Quadratic Cost Function

  • Marginal Cost Increases Linearly: The marginal cost of each additional vote increases linearly. The cost difference between casting n and n−1 votes is 2n−1.
  • Total Cost Increases Quadratically: The total cost to cast multiple votes rises steeply, discouraging voters from concentrating too many votes on a single issue without significant reason.
  • Promotes Egalitarian Voting: Small voters are encouraged to participate, because relatively they have a much higher impact.

Advantages Over Traditional Voting Systems

Quadratic Voting offers several benefits compared to traditional one-person-one-vote systems:

  • Captures Preference Intensity: By allowing voters to express how strongly they feel about an issue, QV leads to outcomes that better reflect the collective welfare.
  • Reduces Majority Domination: The quadratic cost makes it costly for majority groups to overpower minority interests on every issue.
  • Encourages Honest Voting: Voters are incentivized to allocate votes in proportion to their true preferences, reducing manipulation.

By understanding the foundation of Quadratic Voting, stakeholders in Web3 communities can appreciate how this system supports more representative governance.

Conclusion

Quadratic voting is a novel voting system that may be used within DAOs to foster decentralization. The key idea is to make the cost of voting on a certain issue increase quadratically. The leading player that makes use of this mechanism is Optimism. If you're pondering about the design of your DAO, we highly recommend taking a look at their research on quadratic funding.

If you're looking to create a robust governance model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure that your DAO will stand out as a beacon of innovation and resilience in the long term.